Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Marshall, post: 2493307, member: 21705&quot;]I came up with the S-94 as well. The first Key is the loops are the Reverse of 1797 style. All three meet this criteria, but is kept in mind in eliminating many of the possibilities from the 96 variants.</p><p><br /></p><p>Eduard also noted the concavo-convex blanks&nbsp; common on the S-94 and the subject appears on such a blank, convex on the reverse and concave on the obverse.</p><p><br /></p><p>The E and T are low and lean right.</p><p><br /></p><p>The O and N of one are close.</p><p><br /></p><p>Finally, the berry left of C(E) is just below the top of the C.</p><p><br /></p><p>Location of other identifiable markers is consistent. However; what appears to be a berry away from the left stem adjacent to the left ribbon loop (like on the S-113) is probably post mint damage of some type. This is certainly more likely than a new variety with so many similarities to the reverse K of the S-94.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in