Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Slider, post: 1902934, member: 44205&quot;]You&#039;re correct.&nbsp; It doesn&#039;t mention those words.&nbsp; It states that the designs were compiled as unused favorites from past coin designs, and were not directly created as potential replacement designs for the ASE.&nbsp;&nbsp; That is my point. I thought I was pretty clear on that. </p><p><br /></p><p>It&#039;s all there plain to see, but I&#039;ll recap anyway:</p><p><br /></p><p>1. You made a comment about not liking the words associated with the US government, implying that you thought the designs were specific to the ASE.</p><p><br /></p><p>2. Lehigh responded saying that he thought the offending words would be removed since they were designs for a prior coin, not the ASE.</p><p><br /></p><p>3. You said that you hoped so, because using those words to describe our government is a joke (confirming that you thought they&#039;d been designed for the ASE).</p><p><br /></p><p>4. I pointed out that you hadn&#039;t read the article, because if you had, you&#039;d know why the designs had seemingly unusual or unrelated design elements to them.</p><p><br /></p><p>5. You got mad that I pointed out that you didn&#039;t read the article. </p><p><br /></p><p>No worries - the last word on the topic will be yours if you want it.&nbsp; I don&#039;t really have an opinion about your opinion on the use of those words.&nbsp; My opinion is only that people should read articles before commenting.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in