Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Mikey Zee, post: 2565838, member: 72818&quot;]This has been a spirited and interesting thread<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Needless to say I also agree the OP is grossly over graded. I rarely agree with any assigned &#039;grade&#039; and assess a coin details and it&#039;s overall eye-appeal within my own personal parameters.</p><p><br /></p><p>Once I owned several thousands of coins and about 3/4&#039;s of them were &#039;moderns&#039;, so I suppose I &#039;instinctively&#039; place my subjective grade on all I&#039;m interested in while comparing them to other similar types (for reasonable market value as I HATE overpaying LOL). Generally, I select coins that are most interesting to me for all the reasons [USER=51347]@Alegandron[/USER] has stated--- normal wear being less a concern than surface damage...... and historical context, cool devices and centering being most important to me within the price range I am willing to pay.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in