Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Leadfoot, post: 689979, member: 2972&quot;]That&#039;s not all I got from your post, but that is the logical conclusion that I drew from this line of logic:</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>What I take from the above comment is that we should ignore intent (i.e. &quot;the means&quot;) and focus on the toning (i.e. &quot;the ends&quot;).&nbsp;&nbsp; Said another way (and if I&#039;m following you), it doesn&#039;t matter if the toning was natural/artifical or intended/unintended -- just look at the coin and judge it on your own likes/dislikes.&nbsp; That simply a conclusion that I am willing to draw because it essentially gives carte blanche to (a) deceive people into spending lots of money on coins that they believe are natural/unintentional, and (b) decrease the value of the natural/unintentional coins already in the marketplace (through an increased supply of ready-made AT coins).</p><p><br /></p><p>If I&#039;ve misinterpreted your comments or drawn the wrong conclusion, I&#039;m&nbsp; all ears.&nbsp; Alternatively, if you&#039;d like to let this discussion end with us agreeing to disagree, that&#039;s OK too, and I appreciate the opportunity to explain myself.&nbsp;&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Take care...Mike[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in