Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by dwhiz, Sep 29, 2010.
Well here it is folks-I'm too cheap to buy the other one. Looks much better in hand.
Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.
Yes, I just hope no one gets trys to missrepresent it. As for me it says in collection as you see it in the picture. Thanks for your concern!
I suspect misrepresentation is high on many purchasers' list, even if they would deny it from the depths. The question is just how soon.
It means that the coin was not handled individually (e.g. carefully), and as such, may have bag marks and reed marks thay make the coin look like a realistic MS-63, as opposed to his other offering, which is on the level of an MS-68.
pure insanity ... it's one of my favorite coin stories ... i vaguely remember this being in the news ... I was 8 in 1965 and wanted one ... anyway i paid next to nothing for it ...
didn't you ever buy something completely useless?
The hobby act was enacted for coin collectors, so at a minimum we should abide by it. Have you asked the producer why he feels he didn't have to stamp copy on it?
FYI, fantasy restrikes/overstrikes aren't required to have the word COPY on them. Daniel is a very sharp dude and knows exactly what he's doing, and breaking the law is not it.
From what I've read thusfar, most folks who are purchasing them are hoping to flip them for a profit at some point in the future. The rest just think they are neat and want one.
Separate names with a comma.