Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Are you working on a type set?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="900fine, post: 563856, member: 6036"]I'm working on a US Type set, 1793 - present, but with some provisos...</p><p> </p><p><b>Certain types are too expensive</b>, so I probably <i>won't have identical designs on different denominations.</i> For instance... Capped Bust Left gold. The 1808 $2.5 is insane. So I'll let a $5 suffice for both denominations (that is tough enough). Same for Capped Bust Right (where I'll probably settle for Heraldic Eagle only).</p><p> </p><p><b>I collect designs and motifs </b>rather than types. For instance, the 1796-97 50c type is insane. It's obverse is identical to the easier 1801-1807 coins, and the reverse <i>similar</i> to a 1795 50c. So I'll settle for the easier two, and forsake the '96-'97 altogether.</p><p> </p><p><b>No need to stop at regular issues.</b> For instance, I have a strong 50c section, so I've expanded into patterns, California Fractional gold, and commemoratives (old and new). Makes a great display. Halves are not just silver, but aluminum, copper, and gold as well !</p><p> </p><p>Similarly, early copper can go back into colonials.</p><p> </p><p><b>I have little desire to "fill holes" </b>for the sake of filling holes. No fillers !!!!! A great coin is a great coin. That's all I want. Better a hole than a dog.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="900fine, post: 563856, member: 6036"]I'm working on a US Type set, 1793 - present, but with some provisos... [B]Certain types are too expensive[/B], so I probably [I]won't have identical designs on different denominations.[/I] For instance... Capped Bust Left gold. The 1808 $2.5 is insane. So I'll let a $5 suffice for both denominations (that is tough enough). Same for Capped Bust Right (where I'll probably settle for Heraldic Eagle only). [B]I collect designs and motifs [/B]rather than types. For instance, the 1796-97 50c type is insane. It's obverse is identical to the easier 1801-1807 coins, and the reverse [I]similar[/I] to a 1795 50c. So I'll settle for the easier two, and forsake the '96-'97 altogether. [B]No need to stop at regular issues.[/B] For instance, I have a strong 50c section, so I've expanded into patterns, California Fractional gold, and commemoratives (old and new). Makes a great display. Halves are not just silver, but aluminum, copper, and gold as well ! Similarly, early copper can go back into colonials. [B]I have little desire to "fill holes" [/B]for the sake of filling holes. No fillers !!!!! A great coin is a great coin. That's all I want. Better a hole than a dog.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Are you working on a type set?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...