Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Tom B, post: 2075958, member: 11854&quot;]I was also wondering if it was a proof because the 1950 proof quarters were not completely brilliant like we find in previous or later years and many of these coins had a satiny feel to them.&nbsp; The obverse rims look like they might be better formed than typical, the fields don&#039;t appear to have hits everywhere and the eagle&#039;s breast has better detail than is generally present on 1950s era WQs.&nbsp; Of course, at least some of these observations might be due to the lighting and toning.&nbsp; The argument against a proof is that nasty gash on the neck, which is almost never present on modern proof coinage.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in