Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Are you kidding me!?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 2486048, member: 24314"]I'm going to start at the bottom of this thread and work my way up. Remember, anything I write is just IMO and there are a lot of good opinions in this thread that I did not include here. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>This quote is pretty good. I will add this. Condition/grade/whatever. Generally, the "market" combines/considers<span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 179)"> all</span> the factors of condition into formulating the grade assigned. Now, that NGC has separated some of those factors on their label you begin to have a point. Nevertheless, loss of detail (wear) is the main factor when grading circulated coins. Uncirculated coins are "graded" differently and unfortunately even some wear is overlooked.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now to the coin. IT IS NOT MINT STATE, period. There is loss of luster and hairlines from handling easily seen all over the surface. I have handled TRUE "frosty" MS gold Byzantine coins in the Dumbarton Oaks collection in DC. Perhaps the same slippage in quality within the US market applies to ancient gold these days. As to strike, 4/5 is a joke! Perhaps 3/5 is even too generous. As to surface, 4/5 is another joke. Ditto above. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Many ancient coins did leave the dies the day they were struck with the details of a VF. Nevertheless, At that moment they were perfect (as struck) and<span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 179)"> original</span>.</p><p>Just as in any series (Buffalo Nickels is a good example) once a coin with weak details as struck receives a little wear, to the untrained eye, the coin will look like (and be assigned) a much lower grade.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>MS for an ancient is just that. Problem is these coins are old. Finding one with full mint bloom is an extremely rare event with most of them. Nevertheless, a no problem coin with luster and a very slight tone to mask any friction is considered MS by most collectors/dealers.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Yes, Virginia, there are MS ancients, many locked away in museums and great collections. Experienced numismatists (not me) know one when they see one. They are rare as many ancients have been cleaned. In spite of this, when done properly, many ancients can look MS and are priced accordingly.</p><p><br /></p><p>PS. At the ANA Summer Seminar, the guys were <span style="color: #b300b3">hand striking</span> <span style="color: #b300b3">MS tokens made with hand punched and partially engraved dies!</span> <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie104" alt=":yawn:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p>.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 2486048, member: 24314"]I'm going to start at the bottom of this thread and work my way up. Remember, anything I write is just IMO and there are a lot of good opinions in this thread that I did not include here. This quote is pretty good. I will add this. Condition/grade/whatever. Generally, the "market" combines/considers[COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 179)] all[/COLOR] the factors of condition into formulating the grade assigned. Now, that NGC has separated some of those factors on their label you begin to have a point. Nevertheless, loss of detail (wear) is the main factor when grading circulated coins. Uncirculated coins are "graded" differently and unfortunately even some wear is overlooked. Now to the coin. IT IS NOT MINT STATE, period. There is loss of luster and hairlines from handling easily seen all over the surface. I have handled TRUE "frosty" MS gold Byzantine coins in the Dumbarton Oaks collection in DC. Perhaps the same slippage in quality within the US market applies to ancient gold these days. As to strike, 4/5 is a joke! Perhaps 3/5 is even too generous. As to surface, 4/5 is another joke. Ditto above. Many ancient coins did leave the dies the day they were struck with the details of a VF. Nevertheless, At that moment they were perfect (as struck) and[COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 179)] original[/COLOR]. Just as in any series (Buffalo Nickels is a good example) once a coin with weak details as struck receives a little wear, to the untrained eye, the coin will look like (and be assigned) a much lower grade. MS for an ancient is just that. Problem is these coins are old. Finding one with full mint bloom is an extremely rare event with most of them. Nevertheless, a no problem coin with luster and a very slight tone to mask any friction is considered MS by most collectors/dealers. Yes, Virginia, there are MS ancients, many locked away in museums and great collections. Experienced numismatists (not me) know one when they see one. They are rare as many ancients have been cleaned. In spite of this, when done properly, many ancients can look MS and are priced accordingly. PS. At the ANA Summer Seminar, the guys were [COLOR=#b300b3]hand striking[/COLOR] [COLOR=#b300b3]MS tokens made with hand punched and partially engraved dies![/COLOR] :yawn: .[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Are you kidding me!?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...