Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Are you a "Hole filling" collector?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="IdesOfMarch01, post: 3089535, member: 39084"]This statement contains so many unreasonable, unproven, and crypto-hostile assumptions about ancient coin collectors and collecting that it’s hard to know where to start in responding to it. </p><p><br /></p><p>"What is the reason high end collectors don't all have fine collections of common coins?"</p><p><br /></p><p>This question tacitly assumes that it’s unreasonable to collect specific ancient coins simply for their beauty and history – that a “real” collector would have “purer” reasons for collecting ancient coins than just beauty. Haven’t you written (many times) that collectors should collect for their own reasons, not to mimic reasons that other collectors might collect ancient coins?</p><p><br /></p><p>"We see many collectors who seem to define coins worth collecting as expensive coins."</p><p><br /></p><p>Whom do you believe those collectors on this site to be, Doug? Why do you believe your assertion is true about those collectors? Do you have some knowledge and insights about these mythical collectors that others on this site lack? If so, feel free to share those insights with us.</p><p><br /></p><p>"What is the reason high end collectors don't all have fine collections of common coins?"</p><p><br /></p><p>Quite possibly, some of those “high end” collectors are collecting for reasons different from your reasons. Are you denigrating those reasons? Are your own reasons for collecting the only valid reasons that should compel an individual to collect ancient coins?</p><p><br /></p><p>"I would respect a collection more if it contained good examples of interesting coins that did not cost thousands."</p><p><br /></p><p>So, is this the criteria that separates a “real” collector from a dilettante in your opinion? That a “high end” collector also collect lesser coins that <i>you</i> would deem collectible, even if they aren’t interesting to the high end collector?</p><p><br /></p><p>A hypothetical question: an ancient coin collector is drawn to a particular sestertius for its history and uniqueness – say, a Caligula Three Sisters sestertius. He/she can afford a high-quality example that represents the artistry and beauty that the original engraver intended to portray. Should this hypothetical collector purposely spend less on a poorer example, with less artistry and crispness of features, in order to prove that he/she is a “real” collector?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="IdesOfMarch01, post: 3089535, member: 39084"]This statement contains so many unreasonable, unproven, and crypto-hostile assumptions about ancient coin collectors and collecting that it’s hard to know where to start in responding to it. "What is the reason high end collectors don't all have fine collections of common coins?" This question tacitly assumes that it’s unreasonable to collect specific ancient coins simply for their beauty and history – that a “real” collector would have “purer” reasons for collecting ancient coins than just beauty. Haven’t you written (many times) that collectors should collect for their own reasons, not to mimic reasons that other collectors might collect ancient coins? "We see many collectors who seem to define coins worth collecting as expensive coins." Whom do you believe those collectors on this site to be, Doug? Why do you believe your assertion is true about those collectors? Do you have some knowledge and insights about these mythical collectors that others on this site lack? If so, feel free to share those insights with us. "What is the reason high end collectors don't all have fine collections of common coins?" Quite possibly, some of those “high end” collectors are collecting for reasons different from your reasons. Are you denigrating those reasons? Are your own reasons for collecting the only valid reasons that should compel an individual to collect ancient coins? "I would respect a collection more if it contained good examples of interesting coins that did not cost thousands." So, is this the criteria that separates a “real” collector from a dilettante in your opinion? That a “high end” collector also collect lesser coins that [I]you[/I] would deem collectible, even if they aren’t interesting to the high end collector? A hypothetical question: an ancient coin collector is drawn to a particular sestertius for its history and uniqueness – say, a Caligula Three Sisters sestertius. He/she can afford a high-quality example that represents the artistry and beauty that the original engraver intended to portray. Should this hypothetical collector purposely spend less on a poorer example, with less artistry and crispness of features, in order to prove that he/she is a “real” collector?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Are you a "Hole filling" collector?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...