Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Are overstrikes considered mint errors ?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Victor_Clark, post: 25472084, member: 10613"]They can't be errors since they were done on purpose.</p><p><br /></p><p>A few of my favorites--</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1630400[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><font size="4">Dependent Emirate. Conquest or Umayyad Emirate, A.D. 711- 756. Islamic Fals overstruck on Constantine I Æ Follis, Nicomedia mint (19mm, 2.4g,). Rosette-diademed, draped and cuirassed bust r. REV: Two soldiers flanking two standards; SMNЄ. RIC VII 188. A.D. 330- 335</font></p><p><font size="4"><br /></font></p><p><font size="4"><br /></font></p><p><font size="4">[ATTACH=full]1630401[/ATTACH] </font></p><p><font size="4"><br /></font></p><p><font size="4">Constantine I posthumous issue overstruck with unofficial FEL TEMP of Constantius II</font></p><p><font size="4">Antioch mint Circa A.D. 348</font></p><p><font size="4">15mm 1.4gm</font></p><p><font size="4"><br /></font></p><p><font size="4"><br /></font></p><p><font size="4"><br /></font></p><p><font size="4">[ATTACH=full]1630402[/ATTACH] </font></p><p><font size="4"><br /></font></p><p><font size="4"><br /></font></p><p><font size="4">Constantine I IOVI from Siscia overstruck with unofficial VLPP</font></p><p><font size="4">Constantine I. AD 307/310-337. Æ Follis (21.5mm, 4.06 g). Contemporary imitation. Struck circa AD 320s. Helmeted and cuirassed bust right / Two Victories standing vis-à-vis, holding inscribed shield on altar. Overstruck on an a Siscia mint follis of Constantine I. Sergeev 232-7. For undertype cf. RIC VII Siscia 7</font></p><p><font size="4"><br /></font></p><p><font size="4">IMP CONSTANTINVS AVG; laureate head right.</font></p><p><font size="4">IOVI CON-SERVATORI; Jupiter standing l., chlamys across l. shoulder, leaning on sceptre and holding Victory on globe in r. hand; eagle with wreath to l. on ground; in right field ?.</font></p><p><font size="4">in ex. SIS</font></p><p><font size="4"><br /></font></p><p><font size="4">This IOVI CONSERVATORI was issued A.D. 313- 315. This type was demonetized after the monetary reform in A.D. 318, which introduced the VLPP in bronze. Normally, the unofficial VLPP are circa 17-18mm, close to the official issue; but this coin, struck on an IOVI flan is almost 22mm. So, because of the size and crude overstrike, everyone would have known what it was, but it must have been more important to at least attempt an overstrike, rather than continue to circulate an unaltered IOVI.</font></p><p><font size="4"></font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Victor_Clark, post: 25472084, member: 10613"]They can't be errors since they were done on purpose. A few of my favorites-- [ATTACH=full]1630400[/ATTACH] [SIZE=4]Dependent Emirate. Conquest or Umayyad Emirate, A.D. 711- 756. Islamic Fals overstruck on Constantine I Æ Follis, Nicomedia mint (19mm, 2.4g,). Rosette-diademed, draped and cuirassed bust r. REV: Two soldiers flanking two standards; SMNЄ. RIC VII 188. A.D. 330- 335 [ATTACH=full]1630401[/ATTACH] Constantine I posthumous issue overstruck with unofficial FEL TEMP of Constantius II Antioch mint Circa A.D. 348 15mm 1.4gm [ATTACH=full]1630402[/ATTACH] Constantine I IOVI from Siscia overstruck with unofficial VLPP Constantine I. AD 307/310-337. Æ Follis (21.5mm, 4.06 g). Contemporary imitation. Struck circa AD 320s. Helmeted and cuirassed bust right / Two Victories standing vis-à-vis, holding inscribed shield on altar. Overstruck on an a Siscia mint follis of Constantine I. Sergeev 232-7. For undertype cf. RIC VII Siscia 7 IMP CONSTANTINVS AVG; laureate head right. IOVI CON-SERVATORI; Jupiter standing l., chlamys across l. shoulder, leaning on sceptre and holding Victory on globe in r. hand; eagle with wreath to l. on ground; in right field ?. in ex. SIS This IOVI CONSERVATORI was issued A.D. 313- 315. This type was demonetized after the monetary reform in A.D. 318, which introduced the VLPP in bronze. Normally, the unofficial VLPP are circa 17-18mm, close to the official issue; but this coin, struck on an IOVI flan is almost 22mm. So, because of the size and crude overstrike, everyone would have known what it was, but it must have been more important to at least attempt an overstrike, rather than continue to circulate an unaltered IOVI. [/SIZE][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Are overstrikes considered mint errors ?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...