Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Are Half Cents Overvalued?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="halfcent1793, post: 2795430, member: 86853"]I always find the survival rates interesting. EVERY book you read says that in the early years of the US, gold was undervalued so it was all shipped overseas and melted down. Then later silver was undervalued so it was all shipped overseas and melted. Obviously, since a significant percentage of the mintage survives, what they said about these melts can only partially be true. The obvious fact is that the coins circulated, except for early half dollars which lived in bank vaults just like the Morgan dollars much later. For coppers, the early ones circulated until they were slick, and people continued to accept them based on their size until the government exchanged them for the Flying Eagle and Indian Head cents beginning in 1857.</p><p><br /></p><p>As far as half cents being a workhorse in commerce, they were, but cents were the main workhorse. Coppers were truly the money of the people. The Mint made more money coining a cent than coining two half cents because of the labor involved, so it made a lot more cents (pun intended).[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="halfcent1793, post: 2795430, member: 86853"]I always find the survival rates interesting. EVERY book you read says that in the early years of the US, gold was undervalued so it was all shipped overseas and melted down. Then later silver was undervalued so it was all shipped overseas and melted. Obviously, since a significant percentage of the mintage survives, what they said about these melts can only partially be true. The obvious fact is that the coins circulated, except for early half dollars which lived in bank vaults just like the Morgan dollars much later. For coppers, the early ones circulated until they were slick, and people continued to accept them based on their size until the government exchanged them for the Flying Eagle and Indian Head cents beginning in 1857. As far as half cents being a workhorse in commerce, they were, but cents were the main workhorse. Coppers were truly the money of the people. The Mint made more money coining a cent than coining two half cents because of the labor involved, so it made a lot more cents (pun intended).[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Are Half Cents Overvalued?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...