Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Are grading services getting more or less harsh with their standards.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Evom777, post: 1497648, member: 27123"]As one who has never submitted anything to be graded, I have no experience with any of the services, only what dealers and others have told/shown me. At some point I would like to submit certain coins though. I`m hearing and seeing mixed results with slabs that have come from the "big 3." I have seen an ASE with a nick on the shield that was graded MS-69. (NGC) </p><p><br /></p><p>A dealer I know sent out a Morgan and 1928 Peace dollar that had somewhat unattractive toning....both came back as "questionable toning." Not gradable.</p><p>I have in my collection ASE`s that have been toned naturally and artificially, (that I did not do) and I can tell You that only an idiot would experiment on a 1928 Peace dollar (with at least AU details) regarding toning. Even a novice would of picked a much lesser coin to tone if they had not perfected their trickery. How do the tpg`s define questionable anyway? The term questionable states that it`s not definitive. If the tpg does not know for certain, does that make the coin guilty until proven innocent? </p><p><br /></p><p>Some dealers have said that the tpg`s have gotten more strict regarding dmpl and pl, while others state the opposite. What do You all think about the tpg`s giving out plus grades? Are they becoming more common? </p><p><br /></p><p>Just trying to get some feedback on what`s been happening as of late with the tpg`s. :smile[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Evom777, post: 1497648, member: 27123"]As one who has never submitted anything to be graded, I have no experience with any of the services, only what dealers and others have told/shown me. At some point I would like to submit certain coins though. I`m hearing and seeing mixed results with slabs that have come from the "big 3." I have seen an ASE with a nick on the shield that was graded MS-69. (NGC) A dealer I know sent out a Morgan and 1928 Peace dollar that had somewhat unattractive toning....both came back as "questionable toning." Not gradable. I have in my collection ASE`s that have been toned naturally and artificially, (that I did not do) and I can tell You that only an idiot would experiment on a 1928 Peace dollar (with at least AU details) regarding toning. Even a novice would of picked a much lesser coin to tone if they had not perfected their trickery. How do the tpg`s define questionable anyway? The term questionable states that it`s not definitive. If the tpg does not know for certain, does that make the coin guilty until proven innocent? Some dealers have said that the tpg`s have gotten more strict regarding dmpl and pl, while others state the opposite. What do You all think about the tpg`s giving out plus grades? Are they becoming more common? Just trying to get some feedback on what`s been happening as of late with the tpg`s. :smile[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Are grading services getting more or less harsh with their standards.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...