Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Are fantasy dated coins considered counterfeit?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dcarr, post: 3102797, member: 4781"]There is your favorite word again.</p><p><br /></p><p>The Andy Warhol comparison is valid. Most of the Chinese makes are not of very high quality in the die engraving or workmanship. China is certainly capable of making high-quality items. Several years ago that was not the case for many things. The source of the current batch of high-quality counterfeits is unknown. Whoever is making them doesn't want that to be known. It could be China.</p><p><br /></p><p>Anyway, the statement you quoted from 2007 includes the qualifier "appears". That does not mean that I agree with the statement. My purpose in that post was to point out the incongruity in existing law and solicit some comments on it.</p><p><br /></p><p>Later in that same discussion someone else posted the following:</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>And on July 28 2007 I responded to that specific comment:</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>So, you can see that at the time (2007) I did NOT actually think that Gallery Mint dies were illegal.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is a link to that CU Forum discussion from 2007:</p><p><a href="https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/comment/6638208#Comment_6638208" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/comment/6638208#Comment_6638208" rel="nofollow">https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/comment/6638208#Comment_6638208</a> .</p><p>.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dcarr, post: 3102797, member: 4781"]There is your favorite word again. The Andy Warhol comparison is valid. Most of the Chinese makes are not of very high quality in the die engraving or workmanship. China is certainly capable of making high-quality items. Several years ago that was not the case for many things. The source of the current batch of high-quality counterfeits is unknown. Whoever is making them doesn't want that to be known. It could be China. Anyway, the statement you quoted from 2007 includes the qualifier "appears". That does not mean that I agree with the statement. My purpose in that post was to point out the incongruity in existing law and solicit some comments on it. Later in that same discussion someone else posted the following: And on July 28 2007 I responded to that specific comment: So, you can see that at the time (2007) I did NOT actually think that Gallery Mint dies were illegal. Here is a link to that CU Forum discussion from 2007: [url]https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/comment/6638208#Comment_6638208[/url] . .[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Are fantasy dated coins considered counterfeit?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...