Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Publius2, post: 7367225, member: 105571&quot;]I agree that the coin has the sharpness of high VF, low EF.&nbsp; But it would really be a case of &quot;double-dipping&quot; to say the coin is details and then to also net grade it by virtue of the reason for the details grade.&nbsp; That&#039;s a double-penalty for the same reason.&nbsp; I can&#039;t see them doing that and I can&#039;t recall a case of ever seeing it before.</p><p><br /></p><p>There is also something odd about their use of the word &quot;excessive&quot;.&nbsp; Normally, if they give a reason on the slab for the details grade, it&#039;s just a generic reason, i.e. &quot;Scratch&quot;; &quot;Graffiti&quot;; or &quot;Tooled&quot;.&nbsp; They never employ adjectives to describe the degree of the problem, except perhaps when they say &quot;Improper Cleaning&quot;. </p><p><br /></p><p>When I look this coin up on PCGS Certs, it is there and listed as code 97 - &quot;Environmental Damage&quot;.&nbsp; The code 97 matches the slab.&nbsp; So, why would they slab it with &quot;Excessive Corrosion&quot;?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in