Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Appealing Chanukah Shekel
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Parthicus, post: 7326327, member: 81887"][USER=106954]@James R[/USER] : Where did you get the information in your first post? Because, to quote Luke Skywalker: "Every word of that sentence is wrong."</p><p><br /></p><p>1. As has been pointed out, this is a modern reproduction that was made in large numbers, as it often turns up. </p><p>2. A shekel was a silver denomination. The original of this coin is of bronze, and is either a prutah or a lepton (half a prutah). These are often called "Widow's Mites" by modern collectors, due to the reference in Mark 12:41-44. This type was struck by Alexander Jannaeus (103-76 BC), though crude copies may have been struck for long afterwards.</p><p>3. The obverse depicts an upside-down anchor with the Greek inscription "Basileos Alexandrou" (Of the King Alexander), somewhat blundered. I have no idea where you got they story about the soul of the Hanukkah candle.</p><p>4. The reverse depicts a star. Admittedly, it's hard to tell on this copy, and even on some of the original varieties, but again I have no idea where you got the connection to Hanukkah candles. The original often has a short inscription in Hebrew on the reverse, too, but that is missing from this copy.</p><p><br /></p><p>For comparison, here's a genuine example of the type:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1280193[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>I hope I don't sound mean or condescending- that is not my intention at all! I welcome anyone who is searching for knowledge, especially about ancient coins <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />. But it seems like you are being exposed to some very incorrect information, and I hope to guide you to better sources of info (with help from our other esteemed members here). </p><p><br /></p><p>The Constantine coin: It is higher grade than usual for late Roman bronze, but I've certainly seen equally nice genuine coins of the type, and nothing stands out as fake. But if you got this from the same source as the first coin... that would trouble me, as the person either couldn't spot an obvious fake, or didn't make it clear that this was a modern copy; either way, I would be reluctant to buy anything from them.</p><p><br /></p><p>P.S.: You will probably get lots more useful responses if this thread is moved to the Ancients section in CoinTalk, which only a Moderator can do.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Parthicus, post: 7326327, member: 81887"][USER=106954]@James R[/USER] : Where did you get the information in your first post? Because, to quote Luke Skywalker: "Every word of that sentence is wrong." 1. As has been pointed out, this is a modern reproduction that was made in large numbers, as it often turns up. 2. A shekel was a silver denomination. The original of this coin is of bronze, and is either a prutah or a lepton (half a prutah). These are often called "Widow's Mites" by modern collectors, due to the reference in Mark 12:41-44. This type was struck by Alexander Jannaeus (103-76 BC), though crude copies may have been struck for long afterwards. 3. The obverse depicts an upside-down anchor with the Greek inscription "Basileos Alexandrou" (Of the King Alexander), somewhat blundered. I have no idea where you got they story about the soul of the Hanukkah candle. 4. The reverse depicts a star. Admittedly, it's hard to tell on this copy, and even on some of the original varieties, but again I have no idea where you got the connection to Hanukkah candles. The original often has a short inscription in Hebrew on the reverse, too, but that is missing from this copy. For comparison, here's a genuine example of the type: [ATTACH=full]1280193[/ATTACH] I hope I don't sound mean or condescending- that is not my intention at all! I welcome anyone who is searching for knowledge, especially about ancient coins ;). But it seems like you are being exposed to some very incorrect information, and I hope to guide you to better sources of info (with help from our other esteemed members here). The Constantine coin: It is higher grade than usual for late Roman bronze, but I've certainly seen equally nice genuine coins of the type, and nothing stands out as fake. But if you got this from the same source as the first coin... that would trouble me, as the person either couldn't spot an obvious fake, or didn't make it clear that this was a modern copy; either way, I would be reluctant to buy anything from them. P.S.: You will probably get lots more useful responses if this thread is moved to the Ancients section in CoinTalk, which only a Moderator can do.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Appealing Chanukah Shekel
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...