Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;charley, post: 7844064, member: 5372&quot;]No, that is not correct. It is a common thought and I have heard this many times, but no.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I understand you meant &quot;evaluate&quot;. But again, making a successful market requires a careful plan and following that plan until there is need for a change. The opinion you stated was hashed out very publicly back in 2008 or so. The CAC individuals had very sound plausible reasons, and in my opinion those reasons still exist, and as an entity that made a market, why should they change the plan.</p><p><br /></p><p>Who would you consider benefitted by the entity creation of CAC? The &quot;Doctors&quot; or the collector? </p><p><br /></p><p>Full disclosure: I am disappointed in CAC for the last couple of years, but the reason is that in my opinion, CAC has strayed to a path emphasizing the monetary enticement benefits of their 4PG, which favors the TPGs, and allows laziness and inefficiency to go up a notch in the TPGs.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in