Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Michael K, post: 4764462, member: 78298&quot;]The 1863 is supposed to be thicker and whiter than the later dates. It&#039;s damaged.</p><p>The 1906 has been cleaned.</p><p>The 1932-S could be real&nbsp; but there are probably as many &quot;added mint marks&quot; as</p><p>genuine examples.</p><p>The 1902 Barber is well circulated. $10 melt.</p><p>1926 quarter eagle is a common date, $240 melt value.</p><p>5 peso coin also $240 melt.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in