Anyone else love heavy patina?

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Johnnie Black, Feb 9, 2018.

  1. jamesicus

    jamesicus Well-Known Member

    Here is my “other” Claudius RIC I, No. 112 Sestertius in fairly heavy patina:


    [​IMG][​IMG]
    RIC Vol. I, CLAUDIUS, SESTERTIUS, Rome, No. 112, 50-54AD, (36mm, 28.2gm)
    Obverse depiction: Claudius, laureate head facing right
    Inscription: TI CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG PM TRP IMP PP
    Reverse depiction: Civic Oak Wreath
    Inscription in four lines:
    EX SC
    P P
    OB CIVES
    SERVATOS
    (within wreath)
     
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2018
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    I like a nice even patina, but not when it obscures the coin's devices

    King Philip II 4.jpg
    PHILIP II
    AE17
    OBVERSE: Apollo facing right with tania binding hair
    REVERSE: Youth naked on horseback - Filippos (in Greek) above, symbol -bucranium (skull of an ox) - underneath.
    Struck at Macedonia 359-336 BC
    6g, 17mm
    SNG ANS #850-851; Le Rider #24; Sear 6698v; Bellinger 20
     
  4. TIF

    TIF Always learning.

    It's an attractive patina and looks believable in terms of being original rather than recreated. The color does seem to be what is called a Tiber patina. It does not look stripped and repatinated to me (<-- a non-expert :D)
     
  5. jamesicus

    jamesicus Well-Known Member

    I agree, Bing.
     
    Bing likes this.
  6. tenbobbit

    tenbobbit Well-Known Member

    Shown before but one I find pleasing to look at
    83441[1].jpg
     
  7. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    I was raised in the theory that the word patina is reserved for a thicker surface color that is rooted into the coin in such a way that removing it would destroy the surface. That theory held the term Tiber Patina to be inappropriate and more like 'river toned' or 'water coin'. Similarly Sand Patinas are not patinas but 'soil impacted'. Such terminology differences come from us learning the hobby through different sources that were opinionated beyond any scientific level. I am wholly unsure how you tell a real Tiber tone coin from a cleaned and in process of retoning coin. I do like having a certain number of yellow brass coins that are still yellow (however they got that way). For the record, I do not collect 12 Caesars --- some have collected me.
    Claudius sestertius
    rb1025fd2545.jpg
    Nero dupondius
    rb1100b01985lg.jpg
    Vespasian dupondius
    rb1310bb1581.jpg
    Titus sestertius
    rb1380bb0170.jpg
    Domitian dupondius
    rb1520bb1062.jpg

    Did any of these coins do time in the Tiber or other water? I can not say.
     
  8. jamesicus

    jamesicus Well-Known Member

    Thank you Clavdivs - very nice of you to say that. It looks to me that someone tried to “enhance” the surface by attempting to clean it - before I purchased it. If so, thank goodness they did very little.

    Added via Edit - here is the coin Claudius was referencing:


    [​IMG][​IMG]
    RIC Vol. I, NERO, As, Lugdunum, No. 543 (AD 66)

    Obverse: Nero, bare headed facing right

    Inscription clockwise from bottom: IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P MAX TRP P P

    Reverse: Winged Victory, walking left, holding shield inscribed SPQR

    Inscription: S -------- C (left and right)
     
    Pellinore, zumbly, Clavdivs and 4 others like this.
  9. jamesicus

    jamesicus Well-Known Member

    I especially like the Nero dupondius.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page