Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 2225654, member: 19165&quot;]Several points to make: </p><p><br /></p><p>1. Not sure how we got on this tangent, but there is a significant difference between conserving and cleaning a coin. Conservation is (almost) always acceptable, cleaning is (usually) not. The difference between the two is a topic for another thread (and has been discussed many times before). </p><p><br /></p><p>2. There is absolutely no way to tell if the coin has been dipped based on those pictures. It is perfectly reasonable to expect a coin to have survived in that condition without dipping, just as it is perfectly reasonable to expect that it may have been properly dipped. </p><p><br /></p><p>3. The mark appears to be on the coin, but that&#039;s ok. 67 is not a perfect grade - there must be some imperfections on the coin to have earned that grade; otherwise, it would be a 70. It is not reasonable to expect a perfect coin without a perfect grade, and the corresponding price. </p><p><br /></p><p>4. The lighting may have exaggerated the mark. With just the wrong lighting, a very tiny tickmark may look like a glaring gash. </p><p><br /></p><p>5. If you don&#039;t like the coin when you get it in hand, return it. That&#039;s the whole point of a return policy. In this case the coin is sight-seen, and the buyer has the advantage.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in