Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Any St. Patrick "farthings" collectors?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Coinsandmedals, post: 4051359, member: 107435"]Very cool! Thank you for taking the time to attribute these. I’ve read a few articles on the St. Patrick pieces, and apparently they are shrouded in mystery. There just isn’t a whole lot of information on them. I also noticed that several articles made the argument for large and small as opposed to halfpenny and farthing. It seems as though most believe these were struck in Dublin (1663-1672). If that were the case, then it is likely that Swedish copper was used. From what I recall, there were no major fluctuations in the copper market at the time. I found an excerpt from a book written by Franklin D. Scott (1988) that seemingly supports the idea of somewhat stable copper prices. He points out that when Spain ceased production of copper coins the market price of copper fell considerably between 1626-1631. He then argues that Sweden tried to gain a monopoly on the market but never succeeded. It appears that prices remained low even though Sweden was trying to create more demand. All of this is to say that there was likely not enough fluctuation in copper prices to warrant a reduction in weight if struck at two different times. From the sources I have, it also appears these pieces were not well received in Ireland so it seems odd they would strike a second batch at a later date with a reduction in the weight if they were trying to gain public acceptance. Of course the flaw in this logic is that it assumes the small pieces came after the large, but if it were the opposite, it would make a stronger case for the small vs large designation( i.e., increasing the weight to gain more public acceptance). These points make me lean towards the explanation that the size difference marks two denominations. All of this, of course, is my speculation and I am confident that Martin has an excellent argument for why he uses the term large and small as opposed to halfpenny and farthing. Now I’m even more curious, so perhaps I should break down and spend the $80 on the book.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Coinsandmedals, post: 4051359, member: 107435"]Very cool! Thank you for taking the time to attribute these. I’ve read a few articles on the St. Patrick pieces, and apparently they are shrouded in mystery. There just isn’t a whole lot of information on them. I also noticed that several articles made the argument for large and small as opposed to halfpenny and farthing. It seems as though most believe these were struck in Dublin (1663-1672). If that were the case, then it is likely that Swedish copper was used. From what I recall, there were no major fluctuations in the copper market at the time. I found an excerpt from a book written by Franklin D. Scott (1988) that seemingly supports the idea of somewhat stable copper prices. He points out that when Spain ceased production of copper coins the market price of copper fell considerably between 1626-1631. He then argues that Sweden tried to gain a monopoly on the market but never succeeded. It appears that prices remained low even though Sweden was trying to create more demand. All of this is to say that there was likely not enough fluctuation in copper prices to warrant a reduction in weight if struck at two different times. From the sources I have, it also appears these pieces were not well received in Ireland so it seems odd they would strike a second batch at a later date with a reduction in the weight if they were trying to gain public acceptance. Of course the flaw in this logic is that it assumes the small pieces came after the large, but if it were the opposite, it would make a stronger case for the small vs large designation( i.e., increasing the weight to gain more public acceptance). These points make me lean towards the explanation that the size difference marks two denominations. All of this, of course, is my speculation and I am confident that Martin has an excellent argument for why he uses the term large and small as opposed to halfpenny and farthing. Now I’m even more curious, so perhaps I should break down and spend the $80 on the book.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Any St. Patrick "farthings" collectors?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...