Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Any like-minded collectors?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="19Lyds, post: 2005300, member: 15929"]A word or two about precious metals in coins vs common metals.</p><p><br /></p><p>1. Silver and Gold are much more malleable than a Copper-Nickel Alloy. As such, the designs can have much higher reliefs and much more POP!</p><p><br /></p><p>2. Quantity over Quality has been the US Mint and the Mints of the World mantra since the early 70's in that, given population increases, the demands for fiat money has increased a hundred fold if not more. This increase required if not DEMANDED lower profile coinage on higher speed presses which basically equates into designs that simply have no POP. Even the "Collector Issue Coins" produced in Silver and Gold have no POP because the designs are of such low relief.</p><p><br /></p><p>Comparing the POP of the CnClad 50th Anniversary Kennedy with the Low Relief version of the coin of the same year merely highlights what I am saying as one has POP while the other has nothing other than an extra consonant which makes it POOP.</p><p><br /></p><p>As such, many collectors prefer coins minted in precious metals and all prior to 1965. I believe that its design related and first impressions with the overall quality of the designs.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="19Lyds, post: 2005300, member: 15929"]A word or two about precious metals in coins vs common metals. 1. Silver and Gold are much more malleable than a Copper-Nickel Alloy. As such, the designs can have much higher reliefs and much more POP! 2. Quantity over Quality has been the US Mint and the Mints of the World mantra since the early 70's in that, given population increases, the demands for fiat money has increased a hundred fold if not more. This increase required if not DEMANDED lower profile coinage on higher speed presses which basically equates into designs that simply have no POP. Even the "Collector Issue Coins" produced in Silver and Gold have no POP because the designs are of such low relief. Comparing the POP of the CnClad 50th Anniversary Kennedy with the Low Relief version of the coin of the same year merely highlights what I am saying as one has POP while the other has nothing other than an extra consonant which makes it POOP. As such, many collectors prefer coins minted in precious metals and all prior to 1965. I believe that its design related and first impressions with the overall quality of the designs.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Any like-minded collectors?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...