Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;redwin117, post: 1248913, member: 21438&quot;]Thanks for the link, yes and I see it there the common Double Denomination that i can easily compare the value as Very Good&nbsp; as of 1893 S Silver Morgan Dollar because of lack of details such as Two Full dates and Not a key date as 1995 of Two Full dates.</p><p>Please read the coin fact encyclopedia and try to understand which is which one are valuable on double denomination..</p><p>Like a regular coin an MS65 of 1893s let&#039;s say 625 K, the Very good is 3 K in a double Denomination prices increase regarding of the details in all Images and dates etc...So in a short word you can not compare Apple to Oranges and BANANA.</p><p>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.coinfacts.com/error_coins/double_denomination_errors.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.coinfacts.com/error_coins/double_denomination_errors.htm" rel="nofollow"><u><span style="color: #0000ff">http://www.coinfacts.com/error_coins/double_denomination_errors.htm</span></u></a></p><p><br /></p><p>DOUBLE DENOMINATION ERRORS </p><p>One of the most expensive, popular, and&nbsp; desired types of errors are the double denominations. This error happens when a&nbsp; coin is struck on a previously struck coin of another denomination. Examples are&nbsp; a cent on a struck dime, and a nickel on a struck cent. The most dramatic are&nbsp; those with considerable design visible from the original strike.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in