Antoninus Pius as - please help with identification

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by ambr0zie, Nov 13, 2020.

  1. ambr0zie

    ambr0zie Dacian Taraboste

    Hello ladies and gentlemen,
    Last mail for 2020 with ancient goodies arrived.
    I have some pretty worn coins I would like help with identification if this is possible.
    This one is clearly Antoninus Pius but cannot nail it.

    10.25 g 24.60m so an As.
    Reverse legend - nothing visible.
    Obverse a clear PIV.
    Tried to narrow it down using the position of PIVS but nothing yet.
    Many thanks in advance.
    upload_2020-11-13_22-43-24.png
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. JamesEire

    JamesEire Member

    Antoninus Pius AE Dupondius. 156-157 AD.

    ANTONINVS AVG PIVS PP IMP II, radiate head right
    TR POT XIX COS IIII S-C, Providentia standing left, globe at feet, holding sceptre.

    RIC 953, Cohen 978.
     

    Attached Files:

    Bing likes this.
  4. ambr0zie

    ambr0zie Dacian Taraboste

    Many thanks for your help.

    Sorry, editing as I want to understand properly - shouldn't a radiate crown be required for a Dupondius? I know that for Faustina Sr this is not a rule, but does this apply for Antoninus Pius?
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2020
    dougsmit likes this.
  5. Victor_Clark

    Victor_Clark all my best friends are dead Romans Dealer

    RIC 953 is a dupondius; but both coins shown in this topic are asses. This is 953--

    6472877.jpg

    OP coin might be 957; which has the same legends as 953; though I can't really make out the legends
     
    Bing likes this.
  6. JamesEire

    JamesEire Member

    Sorry, just noticed that the description I copied and pasted from wildwinds is wrong, should be laureate!
     
  7. ambr0zie

    ambr0zie Dacian Taraboste

    Thank you both for your help, in the meantime I have nailed it down to 957.
    I like to identify all the coins I have down to the RIC number whenever possible.
     
  8. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

    It could also be RIC 972 if the reverse read TR POT XX COS IIII.
     
    ambr0zie likes this.
  9. ambr0zie

    ambr0zie Dacian Taraboste

    That is a very good observation.
    I think this will remain a mistery since the only difference between 972 and 957 is the XX/XIX
     
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2020
    Roman Collector likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page