Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
Another serial number question
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Numbers, post: 559930, member: 11668"]Basically. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>There weren't any serials skipped in these cases. But not all of the notes between your low and high examples would've been 1928C; some would have been 1928B or perhaps even 1928A.</p><p><br /></p><p>During that era, as long as the note design didn't change, the BEP used printing plates with different signatures interchangeably. So while the transition from 1928B to 1928C was going on, they had both series' printing plates on hand, and on any given days they'd grab some plates from the vault at random and print off some notes. So the serial number sequence would keep jumping back and forth between 1928B and 1928C. If you looked at a brand-new strap of 100 consecutive notes, it might very well contain some mixture of 28B's and 28C's.... This is why you can find changeover pairs and reverse changeover pairs--consecutive notes of different series, sometimes in the "wrong" order.</p><p><br /></p><p>When Series 1934 came along, with different wording on the notes, the BEP actually destroyed all the old 1928x printing plates and started over at serial 00000001A. But then the different 34A, 34B, &c. series got mixed together too.... It wasn't until the 1950 series came along that this sort of thing stopped: there's actually a last serial number for Series 1950A, and then the next number is the first serial number for Series 1950B.</p><p><br /></p><p>Mostly unrelated to the above: As a general rule, the BEP does not skip serial numbers. But this is only a general rule, having a fair number of exceptions. The big exception is that since the '50s the star notes have skipped lots of numbers all over the place, in different patterns at different times. There are smaller exceptions in the non-star notes too, but these are much less frequent.</p><p><br /></p><p>(When I finally get to answering the question about the plate positions in the other thread, I can explain that last bit better; many of the star gaps are related to the arithmetic of plate positions and print runs. But for that I'll have to come back when I'm not about to be late to class. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie6" alt=":cool:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Numbers, post: 559930, member: 11668"]Basically. ;) There weren't any serials skipped in these cases. But not all of the notes between your low and high examples would've been 1928C; some would have been 1928B or perhaps even 1928A. During that era, as long as the note design didn't change, the BEP used printing plates with different signatures interchangeably. So while the transition from 1928B to 1928C was going on, they had both series' printing plates on hand, and on any given days they'd grab some plates from the vault at random and print off some notes. So the serial number sequence would keep jumping back and forth between 1928B and 1928C. If you looked at a brand-new strap of 100 consecutive notes, it might very well contain some mixture of 28B's and 28C's.... This is why you can find changeover pairs and reverse changeover pairs--consecutive notes of different series, sometimes in the "wrong" order. When Series 1934 came along, with different wording on the notes, the BEP actually destroyed all the old 1928x printing plates and started over at serial 00000001A. But then the different 34A, 34B, &c. series got mixed together too.... It wasn't until the 1950 series came along that this sort of thing stopped: there's actually a last serial number for Series 1950A, and then the next number is the first serial number for Series 1950B. Mostly unrelated to the above: As a general rule, the BEP does not skip serial numbers. But this is only a general rule, having a fair number of exceptions. The big exception is that since the '50s the star notes have skipped lots of numbers all over the place, in different patterns at different times. There are smaller exceptions in the non-star notes too, but these are much less frequent. (When I finally get to answering the question about the plate positions in the other thread, I can explain that last bit better; many of the star gaps are related to the arithmetic of plate positions and print runs. But for that I'll have to come back when I'm not about to be late to class. :cool:)[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
Another serial number question
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...