Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Daggarjon, post: 559724, member: 4230&quot;]well on those three top notes, the differance in the 1st 2 is only 50,405. then the 3rd note is way off. But if a print run was 20,000 12 note sheets, then that equals 240,000. then they stopped, and started back up skipping some serial numbers. so the last 64,800 notes were then printed which included the 3rd note. </p><p><br /></p><p>this is just one plasubile possibility. I would have to assume there could be others as well. If the accepted number of printed notes is &#039;X&#039; then i would have to think someone who knows alot more about this then me, somehow figured it all out to narrow down this number. who am i to argue <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Another pssibility, and i cant say this is what is hapeneing with the notes above, but.... when i last looked at these light green seals in the swartz/linquist book, they listed known serial ranges and a caculated number of notes. But there were how many shades of green printed? 2... 3? On the bottom 2 notes, to me they look like different shades of green. The top note looks like its the light green variety, and the last note looks like the darker green variety (it also could just be the way the image was taken). If these two notes are from different &#039;green ink&#039; issues, then that would explain the serial question. But with a much larger printage then your top 3 notes, there is a much greater chance or possibility that a block of serial numbers was skipped.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in