Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Another Nabataean Lead Tessera
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="John Anthony, post: 1777137, member: 42773"]<font face="Times New Roman">Here’s another addition to my set of crude Nabataean obscurities: a lead tessera of the debatable-bust/Nike type, 14mm, 2.3 g. The seller claims it’s the laureate head of Aretas, but which Aretas? </font></p><p><br /></p><p><font face="Times New Roman"><a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://postimage.org/" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://s24.postimg.org/4jhw71vut/lead5a.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></a></font></p><p><br /></p><p><font face="Times New Roman">Oliver Hoover classifies these tesserae in “A Reassessment of Nabataean Lead Coinage in Light of New Discoveries”, wherein he parses the Bust/Nike types into six categories. The only sub-type that includes a laureate, head is Group F, but Hoover doesn’t assign the bust to a particular ruler – he simply calls it uncertain. The problem with Group F is that the obverse design includes a dotted border. I don’t see any sort of border on my piece, but it may just be faded.</font></p><p><br /></p><p><font face="Times New Roman">It’s tempting to date all of these Bust/Nike types to the time of Aretas II (103 BC - 96 BC), since Nike disappears altogether in later Nabataean issues. With the decline of the Seleucid Empire and the growth of Nabataean civilization, Hellenistic influence waned, not only in the coinage but in other aspects of the culture. However, the typology doesn’t really supply enough evidence for dating. Some of the pieces have been discovered in hoards of coins minted by Aretas IV (9 BC – AD 40). Were they minted during his reign? Or were they merely older coins circulating alongside the newer? The earlier bronze issues of Aretas II are occasionally found in groups of coins minted by Aretas IV, so it’s possible that the Bust/Nike tesserae were simply older coins still in circulation. But it’s equally possible that they were minted during the time of Aretas IV, and the depiction of Nike was a throwback to an earlier style, or that the old portrait of Nike now symbolized some Nabataean deity.</font></p><p><br /></p><p><font face="Times New Roman">My other example is of a different type, bearded head (possibly Apollo), with bull charging left.</font></p><p><br /></p><p><font face="Times New Roman"><a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://postimage.org/" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://s12.postimg.org/56viahral/lead4both2.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></a></font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="John Anthony, post: 1777137, member: 42773"][FONT=Times New Roman]Here’s another addition to my set of crude Nabataean obscurities: a lead tessera of the debatable-bust/Nike type, 14mm, 2.3 g. The seller claims it’s the laureate head of Aretas, but which Aretas? [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman] [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][url=http://postimage.org/][img]http://s24.postimg.org/4jhw71vut/lead5a.jpg[/img][/url][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman]Oliver Hoover classifies these tesserae in “A Reassessment of Nabataean Lead Coinage in Light of New Discoveries”, wherein he parses the Bust/Nike types into six categories. The only sub-type that includes a laureate, head is Group F, but Hoover doesn’t assign the bust to a particular ruler – he simply calls it uncertain. The problem with Group F is that the obverse design includes a dotted border. I don’t see any sort of border on my piece, but it may just be faded.[/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman] [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman]It’s tempting to date all of these Bust/Nike types to the time of Aretas II (103 BC - 96 BC), since Nike disappears altogether in later Nabataean issues. With the decline of the Seleucid Empire and the growth of Nabataean civilization, Hellenistic influence waned, not only in the coinage but in other aspects of the culture. However, the typology doesn’t really supply enough evidence for dating. Some of the pieces have been discovered in hoards of coins minted by Aretas IV (9 BC – AD 40). Were they minted during his reign? Or were they merely older coins circulating alongside the newer? The earlier bronze issues of Aretas II are occasionally found in groups of coins minted by Aretas IV, so it’s possible that the Bust/Nike tesserae were simply older coins still in circulation. But it’s equally possible that they were minted during the time of Aretas IV, and the depiction of Nike was a throwback to an earlier style, or that the old portrait of Nike now symbolized some Nabataean deity.[/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman] [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman]My other example is of a different type, bearded head (possibly Apollo), with bull charging left.[/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman] [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][url=http://postimage.org/][img]http://s12.postimg.org/56viahral/lead4both2.jpg[/img][/url][/FONT][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Another Nabataean Lead Tessera
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...