Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;-jeffB, post: 1687051, member: 27832&quot;]So, gbroke and Log Potato (in <a href="http://www.cointalk.com/t114184-93/#post1685070" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.cointalk.com/t114184-93/#post1685070">the Barber Photos thread</a>) have expressed the opinion that this coin may not grade cleanly. It would be great if you&#039;re both wrong <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />, but I think the sensible thing is to go ahead and send it in -- somewhere.</p><p><br /></p><p>So, my next question: which is better for a coin that&#039;s <i>likely</i> to get a details grade -- NGC or PCGS? (Or, for that matter, ANACS, or an even lower-tier grader?) If the coin is likely to go VF Details, would it market better as PCGS &quot;Genuine Env. Damage VF Details&quot;, NGC &quot;VF DETAILS ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE&quot;, or ANACS &quot;ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE VF<b>35</b> DETAILS&quot;?</p><p><br /></p><p>Of course, what I&#039;d <i>really</i> like is a clean XF40 slab -- and a pony... <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in