Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;miedbe7, post: 2208939, member: 33919&quot;]What about an 1895 Business Strike Morgan Dollar???? That be about as awesome as it gets.&nbsp; I wonder if they&#039;d be copacetic since some say they were made (I think 10/12K) but were melted down and some say it was a ledger error and never existed.&nbsp; Another logical option would be the bookend dates (disregarding 21s) of either 1877 Morgan or a 1905 Morgan.&nbsp; I bet the 1877 has pattern pieces that would rule that out.&nbsp; So if I had a vote, lol, I&#039;d go with an 1895 Business Strike then a 1905 Morgan.</p><p><br /></p><p>This is all aside from the possible 1913 No Cents V Nickel, which is a winner in my book.&nbsp; Thanks for the time responding earlier [USER=4781]@dcarr[/USER]&nbsp; !!&nbsp; You&#039;re cool too [USER=37839]@Morgandude11[/USER]&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>edit - whoops why did I have an 1894CC in my head?&nbsp; I think I had bookends in my head before I posted.&nbsp; You obviously had the same idea I had, just even more layers added.&nbsp; It might help the &quot;copacetic-ness&quot; of it, being CC and PL?&nbsp; Either way, I think if it were 1895, just like the 2009 proof ASEs, it have to have some strong markers and even a mintmark if I&#039;m not mistaken since it&#039;s within the series duration.&nbsp; So an 1895-DC Morgan in BS and PL how bout that Morgandude? <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> You would get one C at least...[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in