Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Another coin, another monarch, another mint.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="sylvester, post: 51181, member: 708"]Picked this up on monday.</p><p><br /></p><p>Henry II Class 1b hammered silver Short Cross penny, grading aVF or better (struck well but with the usual prevailance of flat patches which is normal for the issue)</p><p><br /></p><p>Obv; HENRICVS REX</p><p>Rev; GOCELM ON WINC (Gocelm of Winchester)</p><p><br /></p><p>The Short Cross penny was introduced in 1180 (and this specimen dates from around that initial period) and they were struck continuously through to 1247. Although the portrait was modified and altered (often to a much lower standard) the series ran through an amazing 8 classes with many subclasses, based mostly on portrait changes and letter types.</p><p><br /></p><p>The coins were introduced by Henry II to replace the somewhat awful Tealby penny which suffered from extremely poor craftsmanship and the issue ran through Richard I (1189-1199), John (1199-1216) and into the first half of Henry III's reign (1216-1272). The legend continued to read HENRICVS REX (King Henry) throughout the whole period of issue despite having two king's with different names.</p><p><br /></p><p>The one other remarkable innovation with the S/C penny was that it broke from tradition. From Anglo-Saxon days it had been general practice to mint coins of a certain design and let them circulate usually for about 4 or 5 years and then another different design would be introduced, the old designs would be recalled and melted down. As far as i can tell the inference is that the old coins would be demonetised, the whole point of this continous changing coinage exercise was to keep the coinage to a high standard (because long serieses tended to become degraded and debased, as Roman coinage had).</p><p><br /></p><p>To increase the idea of stability though they decided to abandon this policy though and issue a coinage that would remain unchanged for nearly 70 years... as it turned out the coinage remained of a decent silver content but the workmanship fell victim to the degredation process that earlier generations had attempted to avoid with the rotational coinage. In 1247 the issue of clipping coins had become much more marked and in an attempt to curb these clippers and shearers the cross was extended to the outside edges ogf the coin and thus was born the Long Cross Penny.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://www.omnicoin.com/coins/899157.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="sylvester, post: 51181, member: 708"]Picked this up on monday. Henry II Class 1b hammered silver Short Cross penny, grading aVF or better (struck well but with the usual prevailance of flat patches which is normal for the issue) Obv; HENRICVS REX Rev; GOCELM ON WINC (Gocelm of Winchester) The Short Cross penny was introduced in 1180 (and this specimen dates from around that initial period) and they were struck continuously through to 1247. Although the portrait was modified and altered (often to a much lower standard) the series ran through an amazing 8 classes with many subclasses, based mostly on portrait changes and letter types. The coins were introduced by Henry II to replace the somewhat awful Tealby penny which suffered from extremely poor craftsmanship and the issue ran through Richard I (1189-1199), John (1199-1216) and into the first half of Henry III's reign (1216-1272). The legend continued to read HENRICVS REX (King Henry) throughout the whole period of issue despite having two king's with different names. The one other remarkable innovation with the S/C penny was that it broke from tradition. From Anglo-Saxon days it had been general practice to mint coins of a certain design and let them circulate usually for about 4 or 5 years and then another different design would be introduced, the old designs would be recalled and melted down. As far as i can tell the inference is that the old coins would be demonetised, the whole point of this continous changing coinage exercise was to keep the coinage to a high standard (because long serieses tended to become degraded and debased, as Roman coinage had). To increase the idea of stability though they decided to abandon this policy though and issue a coinage that would remain unchanged for nearly 70 years... as it turned out the coinage remained of a decent silver content but the workmanship fell victim to the degredation process that earlier generations had attempted to avoid with the rotational coinage. In 1247 the issue of clipping coins had become much more marked and in an attempt to curb these clippers and shearers the cross was extended to the outside edges ogf the coin and thus was born the Long Cross Penny. [IMG]http://www.omnicoin.com/coins/899157.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Another coin, another monarch, another mint.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...