Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;TypeCoin971793, post: 3187755, member: 78244&quot;]By my measurements, the image for 16.284 is 30mm and the one for 16.286 is 28mm. While I don’t consider it significant enough to warrant a separate listing, I would classify yours as 16.284 since it is closer to 30mm than 28mm.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]822455[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]822456[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>See above. I think it also has claw feet (see right foot in catalogue), so the smaller size is in reference to 16.285.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I am not sure of the meaning of the note either. I think it is talking specifically about on of the many mints in operation at the time.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Probably.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The characters for 16.248 are sloppy, on 16.249 the spines of “Feng” (right character) are tall, on 16.250, the spines are short. Minor variations that I would otherwise not pay any attention to.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]822457[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]822458[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in