Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;SuperDave, post: 2671356, member: 1892&quot;]This one is not_quite the technical equal of the last, although it&#039;s a <b>much</b> better example of the &quot;failure to fill&quot; weakness on the obverse caused by the amount of metal required to fill III on the reverse, which is the basis for the (apparently not as obvious to others as it is to me) argument I put forth in the other thread. I was hoping others would do the intellectual legwork to fill in this blank, and was disappointed.</p><p><br /></p><p>The pressure setting of the strike, speed of press operation, accuracy of die hubbing, die state, die design and even planchet weight differences all play into the character of the resulting strike. That means there can be no <i>definitive, stipulated</i> generalities regarding how the coin <b>should</b> look compared to how it <b>does</b> look, but grosser generalities regarding causatives for certain manifestations when a large percentage of examples present with that manifestation can apply.</p><p><br /></p><p><i>Think.</i></p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m at 62 in my own mind just like the last one, but with that one&#039;s real-world grade as an example, I&#039;ll offer the opinion that this one is in a 63 slab.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in