Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Anonymous AE Repulbic Unica and Second Punic War
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Curtis, post: 24880106, member: 26430"]Interesting period of Roman history -- and very interesting period of Roman coinage.</p><p><br /></p><p>I notice especially the top OP coin (Crawford <i>RRC</i> 56/7 type).... In October I bought a similar one:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1597454[/ATTACH]</p><blockquote><p>Ex RBW Collection (unpublished duplicate; Richard Witschonke [1945-2015]),</p><p>Ex Richard Schaefer (1946-) Collection (duplicate; AKA “Goodman Collection”).</p></blockquote><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I became very curious about these particular types after reading Andrew McCabe's (2013) important essay on "The Anonymous Struck Bronze Coinage of the Roman Republic," published in <i>Essays Russo</i>, but <a href="https://www.academia.edu/15757344/Andrew_McCabe_The_Anonymous_Struck_Bronze_Coinage_of_the_Roman_Republic_in_Essays_in_Honour_of_Roberto_Russo_Witschonke_van_Alfen_eds_2013" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.academia.edu/15757344/Andrew_McCabe_The_Anonymous_Struck_Bronze_Coinage_of_the_Roman_Republic_in_Essays_in_Honour_of_Roberto_Russo_Witschonke_van_Alfen_eds_2013" rel="nofollow">available here from McCabe's Academia page</a>.</p><p><br /></p><p>Still just beginning to digest McCabe's new arrangement, I added a second one a month later (this one a Crawford <i>RRC</i> 56/5 type Sextans):</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1597456[/ATTACH]</p><blockquote><p>Ex Dr. Jay M. Galst (1950-2020) Collection;</p><p>Ex RBW Collection (unpublished duplicate; Richard Witschonke [1945-2015]).</p></blockquote><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Although both of our first coins shown are technically RRC 56/7's, I understand that the early struck bronze coinage may be much more complicated than Crawford realized:</p><p><br /></p><p>I am a total beginner to Roman Republican struck bronzes, so I can't pretend to know exactly where either of our coins fit into his arrangement, but Andrew McCabe gave them a thorough reclassification (and many other types from 215 BCE onward: the series RRC 38 [incl. the 2nd OP Uncia & [USER=44132]@Bing[/USER] 's], 41, 56, 197-198B, 272, and 339 series).</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is my copy of that volume. If you look closely at the dedication page, you'll see why I also had to have the second coin. I felt I had to reunite them! (The book is ex library of Jay Galst, inscribed to him by Rick Witschonke ["RBW"], and also by Peter van Alfen; the coin is also ex Jay Galst Collection, and previously from the RBW Collection, with both of their tags/envelopes.)</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1597455[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Curtis, post: 24880106, member: 26430"]Interesting period of Roman history -- and very interesting period of Roman coinage. I notice especially the top OP coin (Crawford [I]RRC[/I] 56/7 type).... In October I bought a similar one: [ATTACH=full]1597454[/ATTACH] [INDENT]Ex RBW Collection (unpublished duplicate; Richard Witschonke [1945-2015]), Ex Richard Schaefer (1946-) Collection (duplicate; AKA “Goodman Collection”).[/INDENT] I became very curious about these particular types after reading Andrew McCabe's (2013) important essay on "The Anonymous Struck Bronze Coinage of the Roman Republic," published in [I]Essays Russo[/I], but [URL='https://www.academia.edu/15757344/Andrew_McCabe_The_Anonymous_Struck_Bronze_Coinage_of_the_Roman_Republic_in_Essays_in_Honour_of_Roberto_Russo_Witschonke_van_Alfen_eds_2013']available here from McCabe's Academia page[/URL]. Still just beginning to digest McCabe's new arrangement, I added a second one a month later (this one a Crawford [I]RRC[/I] 56/5 type Sextans): [ATTACH=full]1597456[/ATTACH] [INDENT]Ex Dr. Jay M. Galst (1950-2020) Collection; Ex RBW Collection (unpublished duplicate; Richard Witschonke [1945-2015]).[/INDENT] Although both of our first coins shown are technically RRC 56/7's, I understand that the early struck bronze coinage may be much more complicated than Crawford realized: I am a total beginner to Roman Republican struck bronzes, so I can't pretend to know exactly where either of our coins fit into his arrangement, but Andrew McCabe gave them a thorough reclassification (and many other types from 215 BCE onward: the series RRC 38 [incl. the 2nd OP Uncia & [USER=44132]@Bing[/USER] 's], 41, 56, 197-198B, 272, and 339 series). Here is my copy of that volume. If you look closely at the dedication page, you'll see why I also had to have the second coin. I felt I had to reunite them! (The book is ex library of Jay Galst, inscribed to him by Rick Witschonke ["RBW"], and also by Peter van Alfen; the coin is also ex Jay Galst Collection, and previously from the RBW Collection, with both of their tags/envelopes.) [ATTACH=full]1597455[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Anonymous AE Repulbic Unica and Second Punic War
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...