Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dougsmit, post: 3962559, member: 19463&quot;]I believe that is the point of this post.&nbsp; The type is nothing but common but it is not evenly distributed among the denominations.&nbsp; We do not know why but someone could analyze the hoard data and die links possibly to determine if the coins were&nbsp; made in varying numbers or if it happened that one huge hoard made a rare coin originally appear common.&nbsp; It is not unreasonable for every known example of an ancient coin to have come from one find and we never know when someone will find a pot full that doubles the number known.&nbsp;&nbsp; Some collectors see no difference and group all coins of one person as KINDA the same.&nbsp; Others pay attention to details so small that most people do not notice them. I am not a Mamaea collector and only have three of her coins in my general collection.&nbsp; This type is not one.&nbsp; Whether that qualifies as KINDA one of these depends on your definitions. </p><p><br /></p><p>Correct answer![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in