Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
ancients => well, I scored myself my first Sogdiana!!
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dltsrq, post: 2244109, member: 75482"]The only decent source I have been able to find on these coins is in Russian, Zeimal (1983), <i>Drevnie monety Tajikistana. </i>To summarize Zeimal (with the assistance of online translation), these coins belong to the post-Kushan period, following the related Antiochus horse-head imitations. The circulation of the archer coins ended with the Hephthalite conquest of Sogdiana in AD 509, replaced by Sasanian and related coinage. Dating is derived from hoard evidence as well as by the coins naming Kidara (see below) who flourished in the early 4th century. The coins are believed to be fiduciary drachms, over-valued relative to their intrinsic worth and limited in circulation to the region around Samarkand. While some see different denominations, there is no clustering of weight, only a steadily declining module down to about .2 gm by the end of the series. Zeimal divides the archer coins into 4 phases: 1) those with Greek legends derived from ANTIOXOY; 2.) those with Sogdian legends in better style (naming either <i>βγwrty</i> or <i>hprwrnh</i>); 3.) those in cruder style naming <i>kydr </i>(Kidara); and 4.) cruder-style anepigraphic (or nearly so) pieces. The coin which began this thread would be an example of Zeimal's phase 4.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dltsrq, post: 2244109, member: 75482"]The only decent source I have been able to find on these coins is in Russian, Zeimal (1983), [I]Drevnie monety Tajikistana. [/I]To summarize Zeimal (with the assistance of online translation), these coins belong to the post-Kushan period, following the related Antiochus horse-head imitations. The circulation of the archer coins ended with the Hephthalite conquest of Sogdiana in AD 509, replaced by Sasanian and related coinage. Dating is derived from hoard evidence as well as by the coins naming Kidara (see below) who flourished in the early 4th century. The coins are believed to be fiduciary drachms, over-valued relative to their intrinsic worth and limited in circulation to the region around Samarkand. While some see different denominations, there is no clustering of weight, only a steadily declining module down to about .2 gm by the end of the series. Zeimal divides the archer coins into 4 phases: 1) those with Greek legends derived from ANTIOXOY; 2.) those with Sogdian legends in better style (naming either [I]βγwrty[/I] or [I]hprwrnh[/I]); 3.) those in cruder style naming [I]kydr [/I](Kidara); and 4.) cruder-style anepigraphic (or nearly so) pieces. The coin which began this thread would be an example of Zeimal's phase 4.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
ancients => well, I scored myself my first Sogdiana!!
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...