Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ancients => This Little Piggy had Roast Beef
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="stevex6, post: 2434785, member: 44183"]<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255)">Hey Mentor, as you probably already know, I'm certainly not an expert at the nitty-gritty coin details ... but I usually call the older incuse-type "archaic" (4th-5th-6th century BC) ... but I admit that incuse-type coins from the 4th century BC are probably getting a bit "modern" to be called archaic, eh?</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">For example, this incuse-punch example "Bull on Grain" is from 340-320 BC (it may be a bit of a stretch calling it an archaic?) ... but because it has such a cool incuse-punch reverse, it gets lumped-in</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">Bithynia, Kalchedon AR Siglos Bull</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><img src="https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/bull-siglos-jpg.506200/" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">On the flip-side, I didn't include a few coins from the 5th century BC which probably should be called archaic, but because they're not incuse-type examples, I don't think of 'em that way ... </span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">example => Syracuse Heiron I Tet (480 BC) </span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">[ATTACH=full]506343[/ATTACH] </span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">This baby is certainly old enough to be considered archaic, but because it isn't an incuse-punch type, I never include it when I'm showing my archaic stuff! (maybe I should?)</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">again, I am certainly "not" an expert in these coin-details ... I merely kinda go with it!!</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">=> anything that is "old" and has a noticeable incuse-punch seems to fit into my definition of an "archaic coin" (they are the coins that I love!!)</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">Here is a classic example of what I think is an archaic coin ... </span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><img src="https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/macedon-eion-double-geese-jpg.506227/" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"></span>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="stevex6, post: 2434785, member: 44183"][COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 255)]Hey Mentor, as you probably already know, I'm certainly not an expert at the nitty-gritty coin details ... but I usually call the older incuse-type "archaic" (4th-5th-6th century BC) ... but I admit that incuse-type coins from the 4th century BC are probably getting a bit "modern" to be called archaic, eh?[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff] For example, this incuse-punch example "Bull on Grain" is from 340-320 BC (it may be a bit of a stretch calling it an archaic?) ... but because it has such a cool incuse-punch reverse, it gets lumped-in Bithynia, Kalchedon AR Siglos Bull [IMG]https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/bull-siglos-jpg.506200/[/IMG] On the flip-side, I didn't include a few coins from the 5th century BC which probably should be called archaic, but because they're not incuse-type examples, I don't think of 'em that way ... example => Syracuse Heiron I Tet (480 BC) [ATTACH=full]506343[/ATTACH] This baby is certainly old enough to be considered archaic, but because it isn't an incuse-punch type, I never include it when I'm showing my archaic stuff! (maybe I should?) again, I am certainly "not" an expert in these coin-details ... I merely kinda go with it!! => anything that is "old" and has a noticeable incuse-punch seems to fit into my definition of an "archaic coin" (they are the coins that I love!!) Here is a classic example of what I think is an archaic coin ... [IMG]https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/macedon-eion-double-geese-jpg.506227/[/IMG] [/COLOR][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ancients => This Little Piggy had Roast Beef
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...