Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
[ancients] Tetricus?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="TIF, post: 1892748, member: 56859"]OK, Helvetica's spreadsheet was moderately helpful. There is a Victory reverse with "...AVG N" but the letters preceding are COMES and the letter before AVG is not an S. That leaves Laetitia as the only other option.</p><p><br /></p><p>Still no definitive answer to the catalog number. Seemingly clear is that it is Tetricus, he is radiate and cuirassed, and the reverse is Laetitia. The four possibilities from Helvetica's spreadsheets are:</p><ul> <li>If obv is IMP TETRICVS PF AVG and rev is Laetitia with <b>wreath and baton</b> or wreath and anchor, it is RIC 90 (common)</li> <li>If obv is IMP TETRICVS PF AVG and rev is Laetitia with <b>purse and anchor</b>, it is an ancient imitation (Normanby hoard, 207, common)</li> <li>If obv is IMP <b>C</b> TETRICVS PF AVG and rev is Laetitia with <b>wreath and anchor</b>, it is Schulzki 5a (rare) </li> <li>If obv is IMP <b>C</b> TETRICVS PF AVG and rev is Laetitia with <b>wreath and anchor</b>, it is and ancient imitation (Normanby 195, scarce)</li> </ul><p>Given the lack of legend I guess that's as far as I can take it.</p><p><br /></p><p>The weight is still puzzling. It's more than twice as heavy as the average Tetricus antoninianus. Was quality control <i>that</i> bad or is this a barbaric imitation?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="TIF, post: 1892748, member: 56859"]OK, Helvetica's spreadsheet was moderately helpful. There is a Victory reverse with "...AVG N" but the letters preceding are COMES and the letter before AVG is not an S. That leaves Laetitia as the only other option. Still no definitive answer to the catalog number. Seemingly clear is that it is Tetricus, he is radiate and cuirassed, and the reverse is Laetitia. The four possibilities from Helvetica's spreadsheets are: [LIST] [*]If obv is IMP TETRICVS PF AVG and rev is Laetitia with [B]wreath and baton[/B] or wreath and anchor, it is RIC 90 (common) [*]If obv is IMP TETRICVS PF AVG and rev is Laetitia with [B]purse and anchor[/B], it is an ancient imitation (Normanby hoard, 207, common) [*]If obv is IMP [B]C[/B] TETRICVS PF AVG and rev is Laetitia with [B]wreath and anchor[/B], it is Schulzki 5a (rare) [*]If obv is IMP [B]C[/B] TETRICVS PF AVG and rev is Laetitia with [B]wreath and anchor[/B], it is and ancient imitation (Normanby 195, scarce) [/LIST] Given the lack of legend I guess that's as far as I can take it. The weight is still puzzling. It's more than twice as heavy as the average Tetricus antoninianus. Was quality control [I]that[/I] bad or is this a barbaric imitation?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
[ancients] Tetricus?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...