Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;maridvnvm, post: 1818284, member: 31620&quot;]Doug,</p><p>I broadly agree. I have tended towards AVG, then grouping the II C, II CO etc especially given the number of reverse die links here, then moving on to COS I, which is a much larger issue in it&#039;s own right and finishinh with COS II. I would not split out the COS I-I and COS -II into a separate group though they doe generally seem to be earlier than the majority of the COS II coins based on style.</p><p>The IMP mints would logically be IMP II, followed by IMP VIII but calling out the PERT, PERET and PERTE being worthwhile.</p><p>I think it is a very worthwhile exercise. I am up for it if you are.</p><p>Regards,</p><p>Martin[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in