Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
[ancients] Quintillus confusion
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="TIF, post: 1892462, member: 56859"]This one was vexing since I'm not very experienced with Roman Imperials. It's from a mixed lot (Goldberg, Sept. 2013), many of which I never got around to identifying.</p><p><br /></p><p>During the initial sorting and labeling I marked it as Quintillus; the "...ILLVS..." made it pretty easy (plus the portrait <i>looks</i> like Quintillus).</p><p><br /></p><p>Tonight I was taking pictures and trying to attribute it and was stumped by the rest of the readable legend: "...ILLVS IIII C". Huh? It should read "...ILLVS AVG".</p><p><br /></p><p>My RIC resources are limited to free online sites. After going through ERIC, Wildwinds, V-coins, CNG, and MA-Shops it finally occurred to me that the "IIII C" might just be a deconstructed/poorly rendered AVG. Is that the case? The reverse has a similarly bungled legend.</p><p><br /></p><p>It's a nice enough portrait. Weak reverse, centering issues, and there's a hard lump of verdigris in his crown, but apparently most of his have an assortment of these problems.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]322693[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Quintillus antoninianus</b></p><p><b>270 AD</b></p><p>Rome mint, 3rd officina</p><p>Obv: IMP C M AVR CL QVINTILLVS AVG; radiate draped bust right</p><p>Rev: VICTORIA AVG; Victory walking right, holding wreath and palm; Γ in right field</p><p>Ref: RIC Vi 33; Cohen 70[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="TIF, post: 1892462, member: 56859"]This one was vexing since I'm not very experienced with Roman Imperials. It's from a mixed lot (Goldberg, Sept. 2013), many of which I never got around to identifying. During the initial sorting and labeling I marked it as Quintillus; the "...ILLVS..." made it pretty easy (plus the portrait [I]looks[/I] like Quintillus). Tonight I was taking pictures and trying to attribute it and was stumped by the rest of the readable legend: "...ILLVS IIII C". Huh? It should read "...ILLVS AVG". My RIC resources are limited to free online sites. After going through ERIC, Wildwinds, V-coins, CNG, and MA-Shops it finally occurred to me that the "IIII C" might just be a deconstructed/poorly rendered AVG. Is that the case? The reverse has a similarly bungled legend. It's a nice enough portrait. Weak reverse, centering issues, and there's a hard lump of verdigris in his crown, but apparently most of his have an assortment of these problems. [ATTACH=full]322693[/ATTACH] [B]Quintillus antoninianus 270 AD[/B] Rome mint, 3rd officina Obv: IMP C M AVR CL QVINTILLVS AVG; radiate draped bust right Rev: VICTORIA AVG; Victory walking right, holding wreath and palm; Γ in right field Ref: RIC Vi 33; Cohen 70[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
[ancients] Quintillus confusion
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...