Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ancients, last set for identification
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 842795, member: 19463"]While I agree with Gao's post, I'd like to add one little point. There is no consistency to what differences get catalogued separately and which are ignored. In many cases the minor differences point out things that separate one issue from another but sometimes they seem random. If a dot was added to the design at the same time that the weight standards of the coins were changed, you can pretty well expect that the change will be cataloged. In another case there are portrait busts with armor or civilian clothes that get separated according to a minor scrap of fabric and other issues that stop with an unclear separation between head and bust. </p><p><br /></p><p>I suggest that new collectors don't let catalogs get in the way of enjoying your coins. Especially if you don't own the book in question, don't get hung up on whether the bust is seen from the front or back or whether the headgear is pearl or rosette. Some of the most varied issues have the least distinctive cataloging partly because a complete listing of all the minor variations (e.g. Probus busts) would make a catalog several times as thick as the current volume. There will be plenty of time to add these matters to your studies if and when you specialize in the coins. I suggest paying attention to differences that tell something like the mint ID or date range but even these might not be something of immediate interest in the first phase of your hobby.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 842795, member: 19463"]While I agree with Gao's post, I'd like to add one little point. There is no consistency to what differences get catalogued separately and which are ignored. In many cases the minor differences point out things that separate one issue from another but sometimes they seem random. If a dot was added to the design at the same time that the weight standards of the coins were changed, you can pretty well expect that the change will be cataloged. In another case there are portrait busts with armor or civilian clothes that get separated according to a minor scrap of fabric and other issues that stop with an unclear separation between head and bust. I suggest that new collectors don't let catalogs get in the way of enjoying your coins. Especially if you don't own the book in question, don't get hung up on whether the bust is seen from the front or back or whether the headgear is pearl or rosette. Some of the most varied issues have the least distinctive cataloging partly because a complete listing of all the minor variations (e.g. Probus busts) would make a catalog several times as thick as the current volume. There will be plenty of time to add these matters to your studies if and when you specialize in the coins. I suggest paying attention to differences that tell something like the mint ID or date range but even these might not be something of immediate interest in the first phase of your hobby.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ancients, last set for identification
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...