Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ancients: Elymais coins confuse me
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1706392, member: 19463"]It has been a couple months since I got a set of '12 different' coins of Elymais from the back of a Frank Robinson list. After a very little study of the subject I could accept 11 of them as different with the 12th being rather close to one of the others. For years I have owned the skinny little book on Elymais by deMorgan but was told that it was out of date so I bought the new Catalogue of Elymaean Coinage by P.A. van't Haaff. Never have I owned a book requiring more skills in 'flyspecking' minor differences to attribute coins less certainly. In a few cases, my best efforts with van't Haaff led to ID to a different ruler than with deMorgan but usually they agreed at least a little bit. </p><p><br /></p><p>I seek contact with others having interest in these coins (purchasers of Robinson lots or old timers) who would b willing to discuss or trade tips in reading the coins and understanding why one dot seems significant and another does not. I post this here to see if there is anyone here of any level interest (although owning van't Haaff would seem helpful). While I'd love an expert to hold my hand here, I'd be happy to have someone else trying to begin a path to understanding these coins. </p><p><br /></p><p>I'm starting just by taking a random coin and seeing what I can find. </p><p>[ATTACH]261293.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Comparing the coin to plates in deMorgan, I settled on Plate III,5 a coin of Phraates. Working similarly in van't Haaff, I settled on Orodes II Type 13.3 subtype 2-2a possibly example d. The hat has a dot rather more like the example of subtype 2-1a d but my coin has a single top bar on the anchor in place of the double required by that ID. These conflicts make me suspect I'm missing something. I gather that van't Haaff discounted the reverses altogether in separating these dot reversed coins so all the ID points are on the obverse. Of my 12 coins, this is the one with the worst reverse but I am reading it as nothing but dots rather than a poor specimen of a more complex design.</p><p><br /></p><p>Is anyone interested here? I have 11 more of these (some IDed easily IMHO - some not). Should I continue this thread here or find another venue?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1706392, member: 19463"]It has been a couple months since I got a set of '12 different' coins of Elymais from the back of a Frank Robinson list. After a very little study of the subject I could accept 11 of them as different with the 12th being rather close to one of the others. For years I have owned the skinny little book on Elymais by deMorgan but was told that it was out of date so I bought the new Catalogue of Elymaean Coinage by P.A. van't Haaff. Never have I owned a book requiring more skills in 'flyspecking' minor differences to attribute coins less certainly. In a few cases, my best efforts with van't Haaff led to ID to a different ruler than with deMorgan but usually they agreed at least a little bit. I seek contact with others having interest in these coins (purchasers of Robinson lots or old timers) who would b willing to discuss or trade tips in reading the coins and understanding why one dot seems significant and another does not. I post this here to see if there is anyone here of any level interest (although owning van't Haaff would seem helpful). While I'd love an expert to hold my hand here, I'd be happy to have someone else trying to begin a path to understanding these coins. I'm starting just by taking a random coin and seeing what I can find. [ATTACH]261293.vB[/ATTACH] Comparing the coin to plates in deMorgan, I settled on Plate III,5 a coin of Phraates. Working similarly in van't Haaff, I settled on Orodes II Type 13.3 subtype 2-2a possibly example d. The hat has a dot rather more like the example of subtype 2-1a d but my coin has a single top bar on the anchor in place of the double required by that ID. These conflicts make me suspect I'm missing something. I gather that van't Haaff discounted the reverses altogether in separating these dot reversed coins so all the ID points are on the obverse. Of my 12 coins, this is the one with the worst reverse but I am reading it as nothing but dots rather than a poor specimen of a more complex design. Is anyone interested here? I have 11 more of these (some IDed easily IMHO - some not). Should I continue this thread here or find another venue?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ancients: Elymais coins confuse me
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...