Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ancients: Diocletian to the left
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1822566, member: 19463"]I would like to thank all of you who chose not to outbid me on the eBay coin that the post office delivered today. I really did not expect to win it even at my full bid but only one person who sniped $23.99 two seconds before the sale closed kept me from getting it for $6.50 + $2 post. $26.49 postpaid is still fair IMHO. At $6.50 I might have felt a little guilty stealing it from the seller who probably was hoping for a bit more. That is what happens when you sell coins with defects and are honest enough to mention the defect in the listing. </p><p><br /></p><p>I had been wanting one of these. It is an AE1 follis (oval 23x26mm) of Diocletian with the portrait facing left. RIC says it is common but no left portrait Diocletian folles have forced themselves on me until now so I'll just say they are less common than the right facing models. There is considerable silvering remaining but not enough to make the surfaces look patchy as can be the case. The fault was a pit or rough inclusion (slag???) at the top of the reverse. It shows better on my photo than on the seller's but you can really appreciate its horror in my smaller inset image. No described was the fact that the reverse die shows a clash (curved line at right is the back of the portrait head) but it is not severe enough to add or detract from the value of the coin. The head of Genius is textured from the strike not being full enough to erase the flan surface. This is not rare with these large, thin billon/bronzes. The Trier mintmark and B officina are bold so the only thing wrong with the coin is that flan flaw which I can accept. </p><p><br /></p><p>Diocletian AE1 Follis, Trier mint, RIC 282a page 187 volume VI, Genius reverse</p><p>[ATTACH=full]299498[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]299499[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>It has become standard practice here to invite everyone to post their similar coins so I'll ask for a healthy show of all your left portrait AE1 tetrarcal folles. This is my first Trier mint post reform follis so I'll ask for other Trier mint folles of any of the tetrarchs as well. I do note that Gitbud & Naumann had a fault free Lyon mint left facer in a recent sale and it only went in the $90's so it seems that there is not a demand for these "RIC common" coins. I'm glad.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1822566, member: 19463"]I would like to thank all of you who chose not to outbid me on the eBay coin that the post office delivered today. I really did not expect to win it even at my full bid but only one person who sniped $23.99 two seconds before the sale closed kept me from getting it for $6.50 + $2 post. $26.49 postpaid is still fair IMHO. At $6.50 I might have felt a little guilty stealing it from the seller who probably was hoping for a bit more. That is what happens when you sell coins with defects and are honest enough to mention the defect in the listing. I had been wanting one of these. It is an AE1 follis (oval 23x26mm) of Diocletian with the portrait facing left. RIC says it is common but no left portrait Diocletian folles have forced themselves on me until now so I'll just say they are less common than the right facing models. There is considerable silvering remaining but not enough to make the surfaces look patchy as can be the case. The fault was a pit or rough inclusion (slag???) at the top of the reverse. It shows better on my photo than on the seller's but you can really appreciate its horror in my smaller inset image. No described was the fact that the reverse die shows a clash (curved line at right is the back of the portrait head) but it is not severe enough to add or detract from the value of the coin. The head of Genius is textured from the strike not being full enough to erase the flan surface. This is not rare with these large, thin billon/bronzes. The Trier mintmark and B officina are bold so the only thing wrong with the coin is that flan flaw which I can accept. Diocletian AE1 Follis, Trier mint, RIC 282a page 187 volume VI, Genius reverse [ATTACH=full]299498[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]299499[/ATTACH] It has become standard practice here to invite everyone to post their similar coins so I'll ask for a healthy show of all your left portrait AE1 tetrarcal folles. This is my first Trier mint post reform follis so I'll ask for other Trier mint folles of any of the tetrarchs as well. I do note that Gitbud & Naumann had a fault free Lyon mint left facer in a recent sale and it only went in the $90's so it seems that there is not a demand for these "RIC common" coins. I'm glad.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ancients: Diocletian to the left
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...