Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
ANCIENTS: Can a lower grade coin be better than a higher grade one?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1694724, member: 19463"]Many of us take the opportunity to buy a better coin to upgrade one in our collection but here is an example of a time this did not work for me. I showed my original coin in another thread here yesterday buy am repeating it here to start this discussion. My old coin was worn but clear when it came to minor details and had the smallest bust of the very young Constantine II that I had seen. The small bust indicated that the Caesar was young but the facial features (what remains of them) and attire hardly looks like a 13 month old when his first issue as Caesar was released.</p><p>[ATTACH]257138.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p>Constantine II Caesar 317 AD Heraclea mint .MHTE. The dots before and after the mintmark make this a RIC 26 p.545 (R5) rather than the dotless RIC 20 (C2). The only problem with my coin is the wear.</p><p><br /></p><p>Later, another coin came my way:</p><p>[ATTACH]257139.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Look, no wear ...... but also no dots so it is the super common RIC 20. Retained silver (especially on the reverse) obscures the details but more important is that the portrait is somewhat larger lacking all that blank space over the head. Of course being a different RIC number allows me to keep both with no guilt but I could not 'upgrade' that original coin with this one even if both were dotted. </p><p><br /></p><p>More:</p><p>[ATTACH]257140.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Equal time requires showing the Licinius II version RIC 19 lacking dots and also C2 level common. This one has enough silver that it still looks good without the patchy problem of the Constantine II RIC 20. Again Licinius II was a little kid so the bust is small.</p><p><br /></p><p>Another:</p><p>[ATTACH]257141.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>This time we see Constantine I with old-guy big bust. The bust breaks the legend in the typical manner for centuries giving extra honor to a ruler whose legends break into right and left sections compared to lesser ones with the whole legend all in one arc. Perhaps you note that this coin also has a lot of silver and you might suspect that this issue is among the most common of the period to be found today with silver intact. I do not know what process they used that year at Heraclea but it really worked compared to other years and other mints. </p><p><br /></p><p>The issue also comes in Licinius I and Crispus but I have not found them yet. This issue shows how it is good to look at all the coins that were issued together as a group rather than only studying one coin at a time. Sometimes comparisons show additional points of interest to a student of the coinage.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1694724, member: 19463"]Many of us take the opportunity to buy a better coin to upgrade one in our collection but here is an example of a time this did not work for me. I showed my original coin in another thread here yesterday buy am repeating it here to start this discussion. My old coin was worn but clear when it came to minor details and had the smallest bust of the very young Constantine II that I had seen. The small bust indicated that the Caesar was young but the facial features (what remains of them) and attire hardly looks like a 13 month old when his first issue as Caesar was released. [ATTACH]257138.vB[/ATTACH] Constantine II Caesar 317 AD Heraclea mint .MHTE. The dots before and after the mintmark make this a RIC 26 p.545 (R5) rather than the dotless RIC 20 (C2). The only problem with my coin is the wear. Later, another coin came my way: [ATTACH]257139.vB[/ATTACH] Look, no wear ...... but also no dots so it is the super common RIC 20. Retained silver (especially on the reverse) obscures the details but more important is that the portrait is somewhat larger lacking all that blank space over the head. Of course being a different RIC number allows me to keep both with no guilt but I could not 'upgrade' that original coin with this one even if both were dotted. More: [ATTACH]257140.vB[/ATTACH] Equal time requires showing the Licinius II version RIC 19 lacking dots and also C2 level common. This one has enough silver that it still looks good without the patchy problem of the Constantine II RIC 20. Again Licinius II was a little kid so the bust is small. Another: [ATTACH]257141.vB[/ATTACH] This time we see Constantine I with old-guy big bust. The bust breaks the legend in the typical manner for centuries giving extra honor to a ruler whose legends break into right and left sections compared to lesser ones with the whole legend all in one arc. Perhaps you note that this coin also has a lot of silver and you might suspect that this issue is among the most common of the period to be found today with silver intact. I do not know what process they used that year at Heraclea but it really worked compared to other years and other mints. The issue also comes in Licinius I and Crispus but I have not found them yet. This issue shows how it is good to look at all the coins that were issued together as a group rather than only studying one coin at a time. Sometimes comparisons show additional points of interest to a student of the coinage.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
ANCIENTS: Can a lower grade coin be better than a higher grade one?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...