Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;TIF, post: 1821471, member: 56859&quot;]Thank you for the attribution guidance on the Athens tet, Doug.</p><p><br /></p><p>And I do see your point about the thread title.&nbsp; It was a poor choice of wording and I have changed it.&nbsp; I do not blame Stack&#039;s for my disappointment.&nbsp; Well, maybe a teeeeensy bit <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />&nbsp; I certainly take no issue with the two fakes, since the description said &#039;approximately 93 coins&#039; and there were 95, including the two fakes.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>I haven&#039;t taken a close look at the Vespasians yet but will do so over the next few days.&nbsp; It is curious that many (most?) of the Roman coins in this lot appear to have been aggressively (over)cleaned.&nbsp; I wonder if they were purchased that way by the last buyer or if that was done afterwards?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in