Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ancient: What I consider a bargain Constantius II FH... and why
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1685878, member: 19463"]This coin had all the signs of something to avoid according to our standard advice. The seller dealt mostly in things other than ancient coins and came from a country that I have had problems with before in terms of non-delivery. The photo was good enough that I believed the coin was of correct style and the surfaces are not the kind easily and frequently falsified so I bid on it fully expecting to lose it to someone at the last second. My most recent previous FH coin (the doublestruck PARL) also came from 'overseas' costing more in postage than for the coin itself. It also came from a non-coin dealer. I see a pattern here. The only reason I risked bids on either is that the coins were of a style that I considered very appropriate for their type and mint but were not exact duplicates of the usual examples down to the finest detail. Compare to DK FT 553 RIC 82 on Dane's FH site:</p><p><a href="http://www.catbikes.ch/helvetica/ft-constantinople.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.catbikes.ch/helvetica/ft-constantinople.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.catbikes.ch/helvetica/ft-constantinople.htm</a></p><p>They are not die duplicates but probably were cut by the same hand IMHO.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1685878, member: 19463"]This coin had all the signs of something to avoid according to our standard advice. The seller dealt mostly in things other than ancient coins and came from a country that I have had problems with before in terms of non-delivery. The photo was good enough that I believed the coin was of correct style and the surfaces are not the kind easily and frequently falsified so I bid on it fully expecting to lose it to someone at the last second. My most recent previous FH coin (the doublestruck PARL) also came from 'overseas' costing more in postage than for the coin itself. It also came from a non-coin dealer. I see a pattern here. The only reason I risked bids on either is that the coins were of a style that I considered very appropriate for their type and mint but were not exact duplicates of the usual examples down to the finest detail. Compare to DK FT 553 RIC 82 on Dane's FH site: [URL]http://www.catbikes.ch/helvetica/ft-constantinople.htm[/URL] They are not die duplicates but probably were cut by the same hand IMHO.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ancient: What I consider a bargain Constantius II FH... and why
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...