Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ancient: What I consider a bargain Constantius II FH... and why
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1685648, member: 19463"]Ides asked I post an example of what I considered an underpriced coin. This arrived today after crossing the Atlantic. Postage was $6 but the hammer price on the coin was $5.05 making it $11.05 delivered. I consider the coin worth at least $33.15, 3x if you require me to multiply the postage as well or 5x+ if we only multiply the bid price. People don't bid on coins with postage higher than the value of the coin in their estimation. </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH]253611.vB[/ATTACH][ATTACH]253612.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Most of the coins Ides posts are what I might call perfect. None of my coins are. I have to be selective choosing faulty coins with faults I can accept. There are many $5 Falling Horsemen that I would not pay $1 to own and I have over 120 of the type so why did I consider this worth the extreme <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> expenditure? It is a Constantius II AE2 at 24mm. This coin is a common Constantinople mint workshop 11 with a slightly weak strike of the CONSIA* mintmark. It has a really nice strike of the soldier (often found to be flat headed but not here) and a clear pigtailed, bareheaded barbarian. The horse could be better. The reason I wanted the coin, however was the soldiers shoes. I have never seen a better detailed pair of army boots on one of these coins. First, they have an overall dot pattern suggesting texture (perhaps laces???). From the top hang two long strings ending in a heavy ball. What are these supposed to represent? I have seen other army boots with 'wings' at the top which I believed were related to Mercury but these seem certain to be something else. My favorite coins are those that have something to teach me. The coin is not a great beauty even though it has a decent green patina (unfortunately with some patchy red/brown here and there). I am not a seeker of perfect coins but prefer interesting ones. To me, this one has more than $5.05 plus postage worth of interest. What kind of fool would buy a coin for a pair of shoes? This kind. </p><p><br /></p><p>I would love to see other (better?) shoe coins. Anyone who knows anything about Roman shoes that could explain these, please come forward. These look nothing like the sandals or full shoes I have seen in drawings. Perhaps it is just an example of a die cutter who liked dots (it has been pointed out that the shields and other parts of this dies are also dotty).[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1685648, member: 19463"]Ides asked I post an example of what I considered an underpriced coin. This arrived today after crossing the Atlantic. Postage was $6 but the hammer price on the coin was $5.05 making it $11.05 delivered. I consider the coin worth at least $33.15, 3x if you require me to multiply the postage as well or 5x+ if we only multiply the bid price. People don't bid on coins with postage higher than the value of the coin in their estimation. [ATTACH]253611.vB[/ATTACH][ATTACH]253612.vB[/ATTACH] Most of the coins Ides posts are what I might call perfect. None of my coins are. I have to be selective choosing faulty coins with faults I can accept. There are many $5 Falling Horsemen that I would not pay $1 to own and I have over 120 of the type so why did I consider this worth the extreme ;) expenditure? It is a Constantius II AE2 at 24mm. This coin is a common Constantinople mint workshop 11 with a slightly weak strike of the CONSIA* mintmark. It has a really nice strike of the soldier (often found to be flat headed but not here) and a clear pigtailed, bareheaded barbarian. The horse could be better. The reason I wanted the coin, however was the soldiers shoes. I have never seen a better detailed pair of army boots on one of these coins. First, they have an overall dot pattern suggesting texture (perhaps laces???). From the top hang two long strings ending in a heavy ball. What are these supposed to represent? I have seen other army boots with 'wings' at the top which I believed were related to Mercury but these seem certain to be something else. My favorite coins are those that have something to teach me. The coin is not a great beauty even though it has a decent green patina (unfortunately with some patchy red/brown here and there). I am not a seeker of perfect coins but prefer interesting ones. To me, this one has more than $5.05 plus postage worth of interest. What kind of fool would buy a coin for a pair of shoes? This kind. I would love to see other (better?) shoe coins. Anyone who knows anything about Roman shoes that could explain these, please come forward. These look nothing like the sandals or full shoes I have seen in drawings. Perhaps it is just an example of a die cutter who liked dots (it has been pointed out that the shields and other parts of this dies are also dotty).[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ancient: What I consider a bargain Constantius II FH... and why
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...