Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ancient oddities
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 868609, member: 19463"]Modern coin collectors often like odd and error coins but we rarely hear of ancient collectors who specialize in such things. This is mostly because every ancient die was a one of a kind production so there are more variations than similarities in some issues. This post is to share that ancient oddities exist if you wish to seek them out. Neither of these coins is much to look at but finding EF+ examples will take a while and cost an arm and a leg if they even exist.</p><p><br /></p><p>First is an overdate tetradrachm of Ptolemy II (285-246 BC) of Egypt. This series bore a Greek numeral date to the right of the eagle giving the year of the king's reign (I need not point out that BC dating had not been invented - right?). This appears to read lambda gamma or 33 (the Greeks used a different letter for the tens place than the ones). However under the gamma is what appears to be a delta or 4. That would seem to make this a year 33/34 but overdates should always have the larger number on top. I believe this one would be 34/33 except that the excessive wear has flattened the more deeply cut delta to the point that it is overshadowed by the original gamma. To prove this, I need to find a nicer specimen but this is the only one I have seen. I could just be the correction of an error. Perhaps time will tell.</p><p><br /></p><p>The second tetradrachm of Syracuse in Sicily is a bit of a dog but nice ones of these are way out of my price range. It is a known and cataloged variety <img src="http://file:///C:/Users/Doug/AppData/Local/Temp/moz-screenshot.png" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" />(Boehringer 703 - V345/R481) showing a massive die break behind and above the head of Arethusa on the reverse. As this break progressed, the mint workers must have been well aware that any strike could be the last for this very expensive die so it appears they were favoring the broken side by inclining the die resulting in a bit flat strike on the damaged side. Die breaks are common on ancient coins but most are just cracks. I only have a few that show hunks missing. It is amazing that a society which valued coin art enough to produce some of the finest coin art ever made would use those dies after they were completely wrecked. I suspect that the cutter was working feverishly on a replacement for this die hoping to finish before this one gave out completely.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 868609, member: 19463"]Modern coin collectors often like odd and error coins but we rarely hear of ancient collectors who specialize in such things. This is mostly because every ancient die was a one of a kind production so there are more variations than similarities in some issues. This post is to share that ancient oddities exist if you wish to seek them out. Neither of these coins is much to look at but finding EF+ examples will take a while and cost an arm and a leg if they even exist. First is an overdate tetradrachm of Ptolemy II (285-246 BC) of Egypt. This series bore a Greek numeral date to the right of the eagle giving the year of the king's reign (I need not point out that BC dating had not been invented - right?). This appears to read lambda gamma or 33 (the Greeks used a different letter for the tens place than the ones). However under the gamma is what appears to be a delta or 4. That would seem to make this a year 33/34 but overdates should always have the larger number on top. I believe this one would be 34/33 except that the excessive wear has flattened the more deeply cut delta to the point that it is overshadowed by the original gamma. To prove this, I need to find a nicer specimen but this is the only one I have seen. I could just be the correction of an error. Perhaps time will tell. The second tetradrachm of Syracuse in Sicily is a bit of a dog but nice ones of these are way out of my price range. It is a known and cataloged variety [IMG]file:///C:/Users/Doug/AppData/Local/Temp/moz-screenshot.png[/IMG](Boehringer 703 - V345/R481) showing a massive die break behind and above the head of Arethusa on the reverse. As this break progressed, the mint workers must have been well aware that any strike could be the last for this very expensive die so it appears they were favoring the broken side by inclining the die resulting in a bit flat strike on the damaged side. Die breaks are common on ancient coins but most are just cracks. I only have a few that show hunks missing. It is amazing that a society which valued coin art enough to produce some of the finest coin art ever made would use those dies after they were completely wrecked. I suspect that the cutter was working feverishly on a replacement for this die hoping to finish before this one gave out completely.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ancient oddities
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...