Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
ANCIENT - Holy Shekel! - Question on one of the 30 pieces.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Ancientnoob, post: 1720175, member: 44140"]While feeding on the bottom...this coin presented itself.:mouth: The dealer seemed very knowledgable about the coins he sold, and is very reputable and well known, and was introduced to me by collect89!:high5:</p><p><br /></p><p>I could not leave the show without taking possession of this piece. Its of a type I needed (for my biblical shekel collection), and wanted for my (Ancient Coin Collection):smile</p><p><br /></p><p>The dimensions are my own but the attribution belongs to the dealer. With a fresh mind today, I feel it might be incorrect.</p><p><br /></p><p>Phoenicia, Tyre </p><p>AR Shekel c. 1st cent. BC</p><p>30.0 mm x 12.17 g </p><p>Obverse: Laureate Head of Melqart (Hercules) right.</p><p>Reverse: Eagle Standing on Prow; Punic letter between legs, KAIASULOU TYPOYIEPAS</p><p>Monograms and dated PKTH (worn) yr.129.= s. 3AD.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH]266476.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p>I believe he is correct with saying it is the first century BC but not with his interpretation of the obliterated date.</p><p>I went in search of similar examples in order to scratch the itch. As I suspected- PKTH would place the coin at 3 AD, Buuuuuuutttt the coin clearly lacks the KP monogram added after 18 BC. In its place is a rather complex monogram of the first series of the Melkart shekels. :too-cool-for:</p><p><br /></p><p>I believe the punic letter is "B". :yes:</p><p><br /></p><p>I attempted to match the monogram to examples on the internet and I could not find an exact match. I attempted to reduce the monogram into its component letters (easier said than done) , and they make something like D PH I TH. I have no idea what the monogram is, a person or mint location?? I did find similar but not exact on coins dating to around 80 BC. Any help or clarification, would be much appreciated. I have a feeling there is no good way to date this coin without the Greek numbers in the left reverse field. The coin is worn silly but still holds a high spot in my collection. (As a coin I normally could not afford even in crappy condition.) :b8nce:</p><p><br /></p><p>Any help or comments would be much appreciated! Thanks guys!(and gals).[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Ancientnoob, post: 1720175, member: 44140"]While feeding on the bottom...this coin presented itself.:mouth: The dealer seemed very knowledgable about the coins he sold, and is very reputable and well known, and was introduced to me by collect89!:high5: I could not leave the show without taking possession of this piece. Its of a type I needed (for my biblical shekel collection), and wanted for my (Ancient Coin Collection):smile The dimensions are my own but the attribution belongs to the dealer. With a fresh mind today, I feel it might be incorrect. Phoenicia, Tyre AR Shekel c. 1st cent. BC 30.0 mm x 12.17 g Obverse: Laureate Head of Melqart (Hercules) right. Reverse: Eagle Standing on Prow; Punic letter between legs, KAIASULOU TYPOYIEPAS Monograms and dated PKTH (worn) yr.129.= s. 3AD. [ATTACH]266476.vB[/ATTACH] I believe he is correct with saying it is the first century BC but not with his interpretation of the obliterated date. I went in search of similar examples in order to scratch the itch. As I suspected- PKTH would place the coin at 3 AD, Buuuuuuutttt the coin clearly lacks the KP monogram added after 18 BC. In its place is a rather complex monogram of the first series of the Melkart shekels. :too-cool-for: I believe the punic letter is "B". :yes: I attempted to match the monogram to examples on the internet and I could not find an exact match. I attempted to reduce the monogram into its component letters (easier said than done) , and they make something like D PH I TH. I have no idea what the monogram is, a person or mint location?? I did find similar but not exact on coins dating to around 80 BC. Any help or clarification, would be much appreciated. I have a feeling there is no good way to date this coin without the Greek numbers in the left reverse field. The coin is worn silly but still holds a high spot in my collection. (As a coin I normally could not afford even in crappy condition.) :b8nce: Any help or comments would be much appreciated! Thanks guys!(and gals).[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
ANCIENT - Holy Shekel! - Question on one of the 30 pieces.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...