Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ancient gold???
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1446604, member: 19463"]The cheapest gold is Byzantine but the question is whether you consider it ancient. For a bit more you can get a solidus (three times the size of the tremesis) of one of the late Roman Rulers. Cheapest will be Theodosius II who made history by giving the Huns 2100 Roman pounds of gold in 443 AD which is the date of his most common coin (below - coincidence?). That is only a bit over 150,000 of these which seems like low mintage so they must have made others for other uses. </p><p><br /></p><p>The last really good looking and cheap Roman gold is probably Constantius II but that is now a $1k coin. Valentinian has some side view portraits which look a lot better worn down than the facing bust types that lose the face detail below VF. This is not a good time to buy gold of this sort since melt value has overtaken the numismatic value a few years back unless, of course, you believe that gold is going to keep going up and people will actually start melting ancients. </p><p><br /></p><p>Watch for gold that is ex-jewelry. They should sell for a discount. Prong marks and wear actually made a Roman gold cheap enough I could buy one back before the melt value went crazy. I obviously don't keep up with the market today but this is what I would (and did) select as a one and only Roman gold. </p><p>[ATTACH]178985.vB[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1446604, member: 19463"]The cheapest gold is Byzantine but the question is whether you consider it ancient. For a bit more you can get a solidus (three times the size of the tremesis) of one of the late Roman Rulers. Cheapest will be Theodosius II who made history by giving the Huns 2100 Roman pounds of gold in 443 AD which is the date of his most common coin (below - coincidence?). That is only a bit over 150,000 of these which seems like low mintage so they must have made others for other uses. The last really good looking and cheap Roman gold is probably Constantius II but that is now a $1k coin. Valentinian has some side view portraits which look a lot better worn down than the facing bust types that lose the face detail below VF. This is not a good time to buy gold of this sort since melt value has overtaken the numismatic value a few years back unless, of course, you believe that gold is going to keep going up and people will actually start melting ancients. Watch for gold that is ex-jewelry. They should sell for a discount. Prong marks and wear actually made a Roman gold cheap enough I could buy one back before the melt value went crazy. I obviously don't keep up with the market today but this is what I would (and did) select as a one and only Roman gold. [ATTACH]178985.vB[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ancient gold???
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...