Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;medoraman, post: 1329959, member: 26302&quot;]I agree. 20-1 was always the intention, and somehow the ratio got set at 1/20th, (5%) to some authors. I have&nbsp; always viewed it as incorrect math. I believe I read 5 years ago metallurgical tests also support a 4.7 inclusion rate, (for a few years at least, until the government started cheating like they always do).</p><p><br /></p><p>Chris[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in