Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dougsmit, post: 1329891, member: 19463&quot;]<a href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/feac73xxi.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/feac73xxi.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/feac73xxi.html</a></p><p><a href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/feac73xxi.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/feac73xxi.html" rel="nofollow"><br /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/feac73xxi.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/feac73xxi.html" rel="nofollow">M</a>y opinions have not changed since the above.&nbsp; As I understand it, the Romans looked at it as 20 parts copper to one part silver or 1/21 = 4.7% rather than 1/20 = 5%.&nbsp; In addition to XXI we have the Greek equivalent KA.&nbsp; Most interesting to me are a few rare coins which are noticeably better silver (double) marked IA or XI.&nbsp; </p><p>[ATTACH]151924.vB[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in